Claudio Sardoni

469 citations
49 papers · 205 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Claudio Sardoni

46 papers receiving 166 citations

Peers

Claudio Sardoni
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 149
  • Economics and Econometrics 160
  • Finance 42
  • Sociology and Political Science 87
  • Industrial relations 1
Replace Ghislain Deleplace with:
Ghislain Deleplace France
Enrico Sergio Levrero Italy
Pedro Garcia Duarte Brazil
Christian Schoder United States
Marco Veronese Passarella United Kingdom
Rod O’Donnell Australia
Jaime Reis Portugal
Claudio H. Dos Santos United States
Ricardo Summa Brazil
Fábio Freitas Brazil
Claudio Sardoni relative to Ghislain Deleplace France Ghislain Deleplace's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Ghislain Deleplace · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Claudio Sardoni

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Claudio Sardoni's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudio Sardoni with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudio Sardoni more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Claudio Sardoni

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudio Sardoni. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudio Sardoni. The network helps show where Claudio Sardoni may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Claudio Sardoni, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Claudio Sardoni Line = papers co-authored together Claudio Sardoni links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
On Political Economists and Modern Political Economy: Selected Essays of G. C. Harcourt
199233
2 200615
3 199410
4 198610
5 202110
6 200710
7 20198
8 19817
9 19896
10 19886
11 20186
12 20145
13 19845
14 20084
15 20084
16 20194
17 20134
18 20223
19
Keynes, post-Keynesianism and political economy
19993
20 20153

About Claudio Sardoni

Claudio Sardoni is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Finance and Strategy and Management, having authored 49 papers that have together received 205 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Theory and Policy (38 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (19 papers), Economic theories and models (19 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (18 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (7 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (5 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (4 papers) and Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (149 citations), Economics and Econometrics (160 citations), Finance (42 citations), Sociology and Political Science (87 citations) and Industrial relations (1 citation). Claudio Sardoni has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include L. Randall Wray, Bruna Ingrao, Fabrizio Patriarca, G. C. Harcourt and Peter Kriesler. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Political Economy, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Metroeconomica and Review of Keynesian Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact