Cláudio Sant’Anna
- Information Systems top 0.5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 1%
- Software top 1%
- Computer Networks and Communications top 5%
- Computer Science Applications top 10%
- Co-authors
- Eduardo FigueiredoAlessandro GarciaUirá KuleszaArndt von StaaCarlos LucenaChristina ChávezNélio CachoFernando Castor
- Topics
- Software Engineering Research (39 papers)Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (38 papers)Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (19 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Systems and SoftwareInformation and Software Technology
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Cláudio Sant’Anna
49 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Information Systems 1.1k
- Artificial Intelligence 945
- Software 329
- Computer Networks and Communications 275
- Computer Science Applications 40
Countries citing papers authored by Cláudio Sant’Anna
This map shows the geographic impact of Cláudio Sant’Anna's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cláudio Sant’Anna with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cláudio Sant’Anna more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cláudio Sant’Anna
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cláudio Sant’Anna. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cláudio Sant’Anna. The network helps show where Cláudio Sant’Anna may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cláudio Sant’Anna
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cláudio Sant’Anna. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cláudio Sant’Anna based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cláudio Sant’Anna. Cláudio Sant’Anna is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 231 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 54 | |
| 15 | 59 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | Assessing Aspect-Oriented Artifacts: Towards a Tool-Supported Quantitative Method | 23 |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 156 |
About Cláudio Sant’Anna
Cláudio Sant’Anna is a scholar working on Software, Information Systems and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Research (39 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (38 papers) and Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (329 citations), Information Systems (1.1k citations) and Artificial Intelligence (945 citations). Cláudio Sant’Anna has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Eduardo Figueiredo, Alessandro Garcia, Uirá Kulesza, Alessandro Garcia, Arndt von Staa, Carlos Lucena, Christina Chávez, Nélio Cacho, Fernando Castor and Thaı́s Batista. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Systems and Software and Information and Software Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.