Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Survey of Automatic Query Expansion in Information Retrieval
2012641 citationsClaudio Carpineto, Giovanni Romanoprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Claudio Carpineto
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Claudio Carpineto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudio Carpineto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudio Carpineto more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Claudio Carpineto
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudio Carpineto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudio Carpineto. The network helps show where Claudio Carpineto may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claudio Carpineto
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claudio Carpineto.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claudio Carpineto based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Claudio Carpineto. Claudio Carpineto is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Carpineto, Claudio, et al.. (2010). Evaluating Term Concept Association Mesaures for Short Text Expansion: Two Case Studies of Classification and Clustering.. 163–174.6 indexed citations
8.
Bernardini, Andrea & Claudio Carpineto. (2008). FUB at TREC 2008 Relevance Feedback Track: Extending Rocchio with Distributional Term Analysis. Text REtrieval Conference.3 indexed citations
Amati, Giambattista, Claudio Carpineto, & Giovanni Romano. (2004). Fondazione Ugo Bordoni at TREC 2004.. Text REtrieval Conference.7 indexed citations
11.
Amati, Giambattista, Claudio Carpineto, & Giovanni Romano. (2003). Fondazione Ugo Bordoni at TREC 2003: robust and web track. Text REtrieval Conference. 234–245.3 indexed citations
12.
Amati, Giambattista, Claudio Carpineto, & Giovanni Romano. (2001). FUB at TREC-10 Web track: A probabilistic framework for topic relevance term weighting. Text REtrieval Conference. 182–191.24 indexed citations
13.
Carpineto, Claudio & Giovanni Romano. (1999). TREC-8 Automatic Ad-Hoc Experiments at Fondazione Ugo Bordoni.. Text REtrieval Conference.1 indexed citations
Carpineto, Claudio, Renato De Mori, & Giovanni Romano. (1998). Information Term Selection for Automatic Query Expansion.. Text REtrieval Conference. 308–314.5 indexed citations
Carpineto, Claudio & Giovanni Romano. (1994). Dynamically bounding browsable retrieval spaces: an application to Galois lattices. 533–547.7 indexed citations
18.
Carpineto, Claudio. (1992). Shift of bias without operators. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 471–473.1 indexed citations
19.
Carpineto, Claudio. (1992). Efficient Induction of Version Spaces Through Constrained Language Shift.. Future Generation Computer Systems. 626–633.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.