Clarence E. Smith

1.5k citations
8 papers · 1.1k · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Clarence E. Smith

8 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Clarence E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 441
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 405
  • Clinical Psychology 314
  • General Decision Sciences 26
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 41
Replace Evan Shelby with:
Evan Shelby United States
Daniel Hommer United States
Mira Fauth‐Bühler Germany
Matthias Vonmoos Switzerland
W Schultz Switzerland
Patricia A. Woicik United States
Benjamin D. Greenberg United States
Claudia Hägele Germany
Sandra Jazbec United States
Lea M. Hulka Switzerland
Clarence E. Smith relative to Evan Shelby United States Evan Shelby's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Evan Shelby · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clarence E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clarence E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clarence E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clarence E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clarence E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clarence E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clarence E. Smith. The network helps show where Clarence E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Clarence E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clarence E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Clarence E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2010471
2 2010342
3 2008173
4 201244
5 201043
6
Basic Technology Competencies for Educators:A Self-Assessment Instrument
19973
7
Archeology of the Shasta Dam Area, California
19522
8
Archaeology of the Shasta Dam Area, California; Reports of the University of California Archaeological Survey No. 18
19521

About Clarence E. Smith

Clarence E. Smith is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Anthropology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 8 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers), Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (2 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (2 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (1 paper) and Educational Research and Pedagogy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (441 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (405 citations), Clinical Psychology (314 citations), General Decision Sciences (26 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (41 citations). Clarence E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David H. Zald, Robert Kessler, M. Sib Ansari, Ronald L. Cowan, Ronald M. Baldwin, Evan Shelby, Neil D. Woodward, Michael T. Treadway, Joshua W. Buckholtz and Ashley N. Schwartzman. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Science, Nature Neuroscience, NeuroImage and Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact