Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Investing in the Health and Well-Being of Young Adults
2015320 citationsClare Stroud, Leslie R. Walker et al.Journal of Adolescent Healthprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Clare Stroud's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clare Stroud with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clare Stroud more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clare Stroud. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clare Stroud. The network helps show where Clare Stroud may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clare Stroud
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clare Stroud.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clare Stroud based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Clare Stroud. Clare Stroud is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Stroud, Clare, Leslie R. Walker, Maryann Davis, & Charles E. Irwin. (2015). Investing in the Health and Well-Being of Young Adults. Journal of Adolescent Health. 56(2). 127–129.320 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Bonnie, Richard J., Clare Stroud, Heather Breiner, Youth Board on Children, & Families. (2015). Government Investments in Marginalized Young Adults.1 indexed citations
4.
Stroud, Clare, et al.. (2015). Developing a 21st Century Neuroscience Workforce: Workshop Summary.4 indexed citations
5.
Bonnie, Richard J., Clare Stroud, Heather Breiner, Youth Board on Children, & Families. (2015). Diversity and the Effects of Bias and Discrimination on Young Adults' Health and Well-Being.2 indexed citations
6.
Bonnie, Richard J., et al.. (2015). Young Adults in the 21st Century.9 indexed citations
7.
Bonnie, Richard J., Clare Stroud, Heather Breiner, Youth Board on Children, & Families. (2015). The Health Care System.1 indexed citations
8.
Bain, Lisa J., et al.. (2015). Non-Invasive Neuromodulation of the Central Nervous System: Opportunities and Challenges: Workshop Summary.4 indexed citations
9.
Hanfling, Dan, et al.. (2013). COMMITTEE ON CRISIS STANDARDS OF CARE: A TOOLKIT FOR INDICATORS AND TRIGGERS.3 indexed citations
10.
Hanfling, Dan, et al.. (2013). Crisis Standards of Care: A Toolkit for Indicators and Triggers.30 indexed citations
11.
Altevogt, Bruce M., Clare Stroud, & Theresa M. Wizemann. (2012). Barriers to integrating crisis standards of care principles into international disaster response plans : workshop summary. National Academies Press eBooks.4 indexed citations
12.
Stroud, Clare, et al.. (2012). Child maltreatment research, policy, and practice for the next decade : workshop summary.19 indexed citations
Altevogt, Bruce M., Clare Stroud, Sarah L. Hanson, Dan Hanfling, & Lawrence O. Gostin. (2009). Guidance for Establishing Crisis Standards of Care for Use in Disaster Situations: A Letter Report.110 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.