Clare Lamont

789 total citations
8 papers, 514 citations indexed

About

Clare Lamont is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cancer Research and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Clare Lamont has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 514 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Cancer Research and 3 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Clare Lamont's work include Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth (3 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (3 papers) and Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (2 papers). Clare Lamont is often cited by papers focused on Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth (3 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (3 papers) and Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (2 papers). Clare Lamont collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Germany. Clare Lamont's co-authors include Philip Hahnfeldt, Afshin Beheshti, Sébastien Benzekry, Amanda Tracz, John M.L. Ebos, Lynn Hlatky, Swati Girdhani, Amir Abdollahi, Michael J. Peluso and Dominique Barbolosi and has published in prestigious journals such as Cancer Research, PLoS Computational Biology and Oncotarget.

In The Last Decade

Clare Lamont

8 papers receiving 502 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Clare Lamont United States	6	219	146	146	110	102	8	514
Amanda Tracz United States	10	222 1.0×	283 1.9×	227 1.6×	116 1.1×	66 0.6×	14	679
Seth Michelson United States	14	127 0.6×	183 1.3×	119 0.8×	65 0.6×	76 0.7×	37	459
Gibin Powathil United Kingdom	15	364 1.7×	229 1.6×	193 1.3×	86 0.8×	137 1.3×	28	717
Renee Brady‐Nicholls United States	9	189 0.9×	85 0.6×	84 0.6×	78 0.7×	49 0.5×	14	339
Irina Kareva United States	16	171 0.8×	307 2.1×	362 2.5×	121 1.1×	67 0.7×	44	836
Mohammad Jafarnejad United States	14	110 0.5×	190 1.3×	313 2.1×	47 0.4×	77 0.8×	17	595
Danielle L. Peacock United States	7	141 0.6×	490 3.4×	187 1.3×	60 0.5×	89 0.9×	9	838
Jiguang Bao China	20	142 0.6×	295 2.0×	108 0.7×	55 0.5×	29 0.3×	82	1.2k
Kathleen P. Wilkie United States	10	112 0.5×	117 0.8×	113 0.8×	41 0.4×	22 0.2×	17	367
Nkiruka C. Atuegwu United States	11	161 0.7×	49 0.3×	66 0.5×	25 0.2×	355 3.5×	13	530

Countries citing papers authored by Clare Lamont

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clare Lamont's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clare Lamont with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clare Lamont more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clare Lamont

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clare Lamont. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clare Lamont. The network helps show where Clare Lamont may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clare Lamont

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clare Lamont. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clare Lamont based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Clare Lamont. Clare Lamont is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Benzekry, Sébastien, Clare Lamont, Dominique Barbolosi, Lynn Hlatky, & Philip Hahnfeldt. (2017). Mathematical Modeling of Tumor–Tumor Distant Interactions Supports a Systemic Control of Tumor Growth. Cancer Research. 77(18). 5183–5193. 31 indexed citations

2.

Peluso, Michael J., Clare Lamont, Andrew M. Evens, et al.. (2015). Proton irradiation impacts age-driven modulations of cancer progression influenced by immune system transcriptome modifications from splenic tissue. Journal of Radiation Research. 56(5). 792–803. 12 indexed citations

3.

Beheshti, Afshin, J. Tyson McDonald, Clare Lamont, et al.. (2015). Tumor-host signaling interaction reveals a systemic, age-dependent splenic immune influence on tumor development. Oncotarget. 6(34). 35419–35432. 22 indexed citations

4.

Benzekry, Sébastien, Clare Lamont, Afshin Beheshti, et al.. (2014). Classical Mathematical Models for Description and Prediction of Experimental Tumor Growth. PLoS Computational Biology. 10(8). e1003800–e1003800. 364 indexed citations

5.

Beheshti, Afshin, Michael J. Peluso, Clare Lamont, Philip Hahnfeldt, & Lynn Hlatky. (2014). Proton Irradiation Augments the Suppression of Tumor Progression Observed with Advanced Age. Radiation Research. 181(3). 272–283. 11 indexed citations

6.

Benzekry, Sébastien, et al.. (2013). Classical Mathematical Models for Description and Forecast of Preclinical Tumor Growth. 1 indexed citations

7.

Girdhani, Swati, Clare Lamont, Philip Hahnfeldt, Amir Abdollahi, & Lynn Hlatky. (2012). Proton Irradiation Suppresses Angiogenic Genes and Impairs Cell Invasion and Tumor Growth. Radiation Research. 178(1). 33–33. 72 indexed citations

8.

Lamont, Clare. (2011). BET 4. Emergency Medicine Journal. 28(4). 336–336. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact