C.J. Armentrout
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Biomedical Engineering
- Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Materials Chemistry
- Co-authors
- G.L. JahnsT.W. PétrieF.B. MarcusWayne PfeifferR. E. StockdaleG. BramsonPing LeeB. H. Failor
- Topics
- Magnetic confinement fusion research (9 papers)Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (5 papers)X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyJapan
In The Last Decade
C.J. Armentrout
19 papers receiving 148 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 20
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 133
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 43
- Biomedical Engineering 42
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 41
- Materials Chemistry 40
Countries citing papers authored by C.J. Armentrout
This map shows the geographic impact of C.J. Armentrout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.J. Armentrout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.J. Armentrout more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C.J. Armentrout
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.J. Armentrout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.J. Armentrout. The network helps show where C.J. Armentrout may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C.J. Armentrout
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C.J. Armentrout. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C.J. Armentrout based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C.J. Armentrout. C.J. Armentrout is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | Beta and confinement experiments on Doublet III with high-power neutral beam heating | 1 |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 61 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | Comparison of energy confinement in Doublet III limiter and divertor discharges with ohmic, neutral beam and electron cyclotron heating | 4 |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 16 |
About C.J. Armentrout
C.J. Armentrout is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 19 papers that have together received 170 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (9 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (5 papers) and X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (133 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (41 citations) and Radiation (21 citations). C.J. Armentrout has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Japan. Frequent co-authors include G.L. Jahns, T.W. Pétrie, F.B. Marcus, Wayne Pfeiffer, R. E. Stockdale, G. Bramson, Ping Lee, B. H. Failor, R.J. La Haye and C.P. Moeller. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical Review A and Review of Scientific Instruments.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.