C.J. Anderson
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Computer Science Applications top 2%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Co-authors
- L. W. AndersonTzu‐Ching ChangKiyoshi W. MasuiUe‐Li PenJaswant K. YadavA. M. HowaldPeter TimbieCheng‐Yu Kuo
- Topics
- X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (5 papers)Atomic and Molecular Physics (5 papers)Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
C.J. Anderson
17 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 360
- Computer Science Applications 151
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 137
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 131
- Human-Computer Interaction 122
Countries citing papers authored by C.J. Anderson
This map shows the geographic impact of C.J. Anderson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.J. Anderson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.J. Anderson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C.J. Anderson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.J. Anderson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.J. Anderson. The network helps show where C.J. Anderson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C.J. Anderson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C.J. Anderson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C.J. Anderson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C.J. Anderson. C.J. Anderson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 56 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 106 | |
| 6 | 46 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 190 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | Theoretical electron scattering amplitudes and spin polarizations. Electron energies 100 to 1500 eV Part II. Be, N, O, Al, Cl, V, Co, Cu, As, Nb, Ag, Sn, Sb, I, and Ta targets | 0 |
| 11 | Makers: The New Industrial Revolutionbreakdown → | 664 |
| 12 | Making the Intangible Tangible: How to Evaluate a Social Marketing Campaign | 1 |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 37 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 36 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 18 |
About C.J. Anderson
C.J. Anderson is a scholar working on Radiation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Spectroscopy, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (5 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (5 papers) and Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Museology (99 citations), Computer Science Applications (151 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (360 citations). C.J. Anderson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include L. W. Anderson, Tzu‐Ching Chang, Kiyoshi W. Masui, Ue‐Li Pen, Jaswant K. Yadav, A. M. Howald, Peter Timbie, Cheng‐Yu Kuo, Tabitha Voytek and Eric R. Switzer. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Physical Review Letters and The Astrophysical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.