Cindy Press

989 total citations
9 papers, 606 citations indexed

About

Cindy Press is a scholar working on Parasitology, Epidemiology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Cindy Press has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 606 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Parasitology, 6 papers in Epidemiology and 2 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Cindy Press's work include Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies (9 papers), Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (5 papers) and Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (4 papers). Cindy Press is often cited by papers focused on Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies (9 papers), Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (5 papers) and Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (4 papers). Cindy Press collaborates with scholars based in United States, Romania and France. Cindy Press's co-authors include José G. Montoya, Jack S. Remington, Jacquelin M. Roberts, Tudor Rareș Olariu, Geraldine M. McQuillan, Hilda N. Rivera, Jeffrey L. Jones, Deanna Kruszon‐Moran, Yasuhiro Suzuki and Shuli Li and has published in prestigious journals such as Clinical Infectious Diseases, Journal of Clinical Microbiology and American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

In The Last Decade

Cindy Press

9 papers receiving 587 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Cindy Press United States 9 569 306 123 88 81 9 606
María de la Luz Galván-Ramírez Mexico 15 422 0.7× 247 0.8× 88 0.7× 62 0.7× 105 1.3× 37 501
Mari Sautter United States 7 575 1.0× 332 1.1× 106 0.9× 65 0.7× 94 1.2× 7 600
M.-H. Bessières France 11 862 1.5× 600 2.0× 163 1.3× 60 0.7× 152 1.9× 21 916
Jean-Marc Costa France 10 704 1.2× 553 1.8× 115 0.9× 82 0.9× 64 0.8× 11 831
J. M. W. Chatterton United Kingdom 14 457 0.8× 350 1.1× 80 0.7× 43 0.5× 44 0.5× 33 545
Cathy Chemla France 11 420 0.7× 248 0.8× 83 0.7× 67 0.8× 92 1.1× 22 471
Jean‐Benjamin Murat France 13 280 0.5× 226 0.7× 75 0.6× 72 0.8× 89 1.1× 18 487
Stéphane Romand France 10 413 0.7× 262 0.9× 89 0.7× 32 0.4× 42 0.5× 14 468
Régine Geers France 9 408 0.7× 215 0.7× 110 0.9× 53 0.6× 24 0.3× 17 438
Patrícia Riddell Millar Brazil 10 288 0.5× 159 0.5× 54 0.4× 43 0.5× 25 0.3× 38 352

Countries citing papers authored by Cindy Press

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cindy Press's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cindy Press with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cindy Press more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cindy Press

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cindy Press. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cindy Press. The network helps show where Cindy Press may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cindy Press

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cindy Press. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cindy Press based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cindy Press. Cindy Press is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Guegan, Hélène, Tijana Štajner, Branko Bobić, et al.. (2020). Maternal Anti- Toxoplasma Treatment during Pregnancy Is Associated with Reduced Sensitivity of Diagnostic Tests for Congenital Infection in the Neonate. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 59(2). 10 indexed citations
2.
Elbadawi, Lina I., Traci DeSalvo, Anne Straily, et al.. (2020). Toxoplasmosis Outbreak Associated With Toxoplasma gondii-Contaminated Venison—High Attack Rate, Unusual Clinical Presentation, and Atypical Genotype. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 72(9). 1557–1565. 42 indexed citations
3.
4.
Olariu, Tudor Rareș, et al.. (2018). Role of Toxoplasma IgA as Part of a Reference Panel for the Diagnosis of Acute Toxoplasmosis during Pregnancy. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 57(2). 21 indexed citations
5.
Gómez, Carlos A., Cindy Press, Lily Zhou, et al.. (2018). Evaluation of Three Point-of-Care Tests for Detection of Toxoplasma Immunoglobulin IgG and IgM in the United States: Proof of Concept and Challenges. Open Forum Infectious Diseases. 5(10). ofy215–ofy215. 18 indexed citations
6.
Jones, Jeffrey L., Deanna Kruszon‐Moran, Hilda N. Rivera, et al.. (2017). Toxoplasma gondii Infection in the United States, 2011–2014. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 98(2). 551–557. 84 indexed citations
7.
Contopoulos‐Ioannidis, Despina G., Kelsey M. Wheeler, Raymund Ramirez, et al.. (2015). Clustering ofToxoplasma gondiiInfections Within Families of Congenitally Infected Infants. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 61(12). 1815–1824. 9 indexed citations
8.
Roberts, Jacquelin M., et al.. (2009). Risk Factors forToxoplasma gondiiInfection in the United States. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 49(6). 878–884. 347 indexed citations
9.
Suzuki, Yasuhiro, Raymund Ramirez, Cindy Press, et al.. (2000). Detection of Immunoglobulin M Antibodies to P35 Antigen of Toxoplasma gondii for Serodiagnosis of Recently Acquired Infection in Pregnant Women. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 38(11). 3967–3970. 40 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026