Cindy Mak

3.6k total citations
39 papers, 334 citations indexed

About

Cindy Mak is a scholar working on Surgery, Cancer Research and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Cindy Mak has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 334 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Surgery, 19 papers in Cancer Research and 11 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Cindy Mak's work include Breast Implant and Reconstruction (19 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (18 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (11 papers). Cindy Mak is often cited by papers focused on Breast Implant and Reconstruction (19 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (18 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (11 papers). Cindy Mak collaborates with scholars based in Australia, China and United Kingdom. Cindy Mak's co-authors include Sanjay Warrier, Heather L. Shepherd, Robyn P.M. Saw, Christopher J. Young, Hugh Carmalt, Carlo Pulitanò, Belinda Chan, Cherry Koh, Andrew J. Spillane and Sang Won Hwang and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and International Journal of Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Cindy Mak

35 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Cindy Mak Australia 11 176 123 82 62 51 39 334
Chantal Reyna United States 10 118 0.7× 168 1.4× 121 1.5× 57 0.9× 36 0.7× 41 313
Sharon Chan China 10 156 0.9× 145 1.2× 86 1.0× 74 1.2× 26 0.5× 19 334
Daleela Dodge United States 10 52 0.3× 75 0.6× 56 0.7× 95 1.5× 15 0.3× 22 261
Kyoko Yorozuya Japan 11 70 0.4× 71 0.6× 115 1.4× 82 1.3× 23 0.5× 27 392
Jennifer L. Baker United States 11 198 1.1× 146 1.2× 71 0.9× 127 2.0× 21 0.4× 36 427
Gloria R. Sue United States 13 235 1.3× 77 0.6× 43 0.5× 77 1.2× 15 0.3× 39 440
Jacquie Jenkins United Kingdom 9 51 0.3× 121 1.0× 137 1.7× 130 2.1× 24 0.5× 20 340
Megan K. Baker United States 11 157 0.9× 96 0.8× 39 0.5× 125 2.0× 10 0.2× 18 386
Neil Wetzig Australia 10 133 0.8× 131 1.1× 96 1.2× 149 2.4× 29 0.6× 25 391
Michael M. Jonczyk United States 9 278 1.6× 238 1.9× 79 1.0× 114 1.8× 10 0.2× 22 398

Countries citing papers authored by Cindy Mak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cindy Mak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cindy Mak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cindy Mak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cindy Mak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cindy Mak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cindy Mak. The network helps show where Cindy Mak may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cindy Mak

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cindy Mak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cindy Mak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cindy Mak. Cindy Mak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mak, Cindy, Lei‐Ming Cao, Hui Luo, et al.. (2025). Postoperative complications of neck dissection for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Oncology. 167. 107430–107430.
3.
Mak, Cindy, et al.. (2025). Developing an Indocyanine Green Angiography Protocol for Predicting Flap Necrosis During Breast Reconstruction. Surgical Innovation. 32(2). 77–84. 2 indexed citations
4.
Azimi, Farhad, et al.. (2024). Evolution of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence in Breast and Axilla Surgery: An Australasian Experience. Life. 14(1). 135–135. 2 indexed citations
5.
Hawes, Susan M., et al.. (2024). Avoiding unnecessary sentinel lymph node biopsy with the use of superparamagnetic iron oxide mapping agents (Magtrace®) in breast surgery. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 94(6). 1090–1095. 1 indexed citations
7.
Zhou, Michael, et al.. (2024). Cost-Effectiveness of Radar Localisation Versus Wire Localisation for Wide Local Excision of Non-palpable Breast Cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 31(6). 3916–3925. 4 indexed citations
8.
Zhou, Michael, et al.. (2023). Novel Dual Tracer Indocyanine Green and Radioisotope Versus Gold Standard Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: The GREENORBLUE Trial. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 30(11). 6520–6527. 18 indexed citations
9.
Spillane, Andrew J., et al.. (2023). Trends and variations in post‐mastectomy breast reconstruction rates in Australia over 10 years. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 93(1-2). 242–250. 11 indexed citations
10.
Zhou, Michael, et al.. (2023). ASO Author Reflections: Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer—An Alternative to Blue Dye?. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 30(11). 6528–6529. 1 indexed citations
11.
Mak, Cindy, et al.. (2022). Cost-effectiveness of indocyanine green angiography in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 75(9). 3014–3021. 13 indexed citations
12.
Mak, Cindy, et al.. (2022). Trends in outcomes with adoption of indocyanine green angiography in postmastectomy reconstruction. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 93(1-2). 270–275. 4 indexed citations
13.
Ang, Su C., Emily J. Davidson, Bora Kahramangil, et al.. (2016). Positive anterior margins in breast conserving surgery: Does it matter? A systematic review of the literature. The Breast. 27. 105–108. 7 indexed citations
14.
Young, Christopher J., et al.. (2016). Workplace Bullying in Surgery. World Journal of Surgery. 40(11). 2560–2566. 62 indexed citations
15.
Mak, Cindy, et al.. (2015). Pre-operative serum alkaline phosphatase as a predictive indicator of post-operative hypocalcaemia in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 129(11). 1128–1132. 9 indexed citations
16.
Warrier, Sanjay, Sang Won Hwang, Cherry Koh, et al.. (2014). Preservation or division of the intercostobrachial nerve in axillary dissection for breast cancer: Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. The Breast. 23(4). 310–316. 29 indexed citations
17.
Karim, Rooshdiya Z., Sandra O’Toole, Richard A. Scolyer, et al.. (2013). Recent insights into the molecular pathogenesis of mammary phyllodes tumours. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 66(6). 496–505. 26 indexed citations
18.
Uren, R., R Howman-Giles, David Chung, et al.. (2011). SPECT/CT scans allow precise anatomical location of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer and redefine lymphatic drainage from the breast to the axilla. The Breast. 21(4). 480–486. 31 indexed citations
19.
Dixon, J. Michael, et al.. (2008). Effectiveness of immediate preoperative injection of radiopharmaceutical and blue dye for sentinel node biopsy in patients with breast cancer. European Journal of Cancer. 45(5). 795–799. 14 indexed citations
20.
Chan, Anthony K.C., et al.. (1992). Segmental colonic dilatation in a neonate. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 27(4). 506–508. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026