Cindy L. White
About
In The Last Decade
Cindy L. White
6 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Molecular Biology 1.3k
- Plant Science 178
- Genetics 45
- Oncology 41
- Cell Biology 33
Countries citing papers authored by Cindy L. White
This map shows the geographic impact of Cindy L. White's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cindy L. White with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cindy L. White more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cindy L. White
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cindy L. White. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cindy L. White. The network helps show where Cindy L. White may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cindy L. White
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cindy L. White. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cindy L. White based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cindy L. White. Cindy L. White is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 68 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 111 | |
| 4 | Reconstitution of Nucleosome Core Particles from Recombinant Histones and DNA breakdown → | 659 |
| 5 | 121 | |
| 6 | 316 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.