Chuntao Dan

1.3k citations
6 papers · 604 · 1 hit paper · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Chuntao Dan

6 papers receiving 592 citations

Chuntao Dan's Hit Papers

A connectome of the Drosophila central complex reveals network motifs suitable for flexible navigation and context-dependent action selection 2021 · 197 citations
1970+1+3Years since publication50100150

Peers

Chuntao Dan
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 243
  • Cell Biology 161
  • Immunology and Allergy 39
  • Molecular Biology 291
  • Genetics 116
Replace Edward M. Rogers with:
Edward M. Rogers United States
S. Sean Millard United States
Benjamin J. Frankfort United States
Tim Raemaekers Belgium
Matthieu Cavey France
Liming Tan United States
Honda Naoki Japan
Atsuko Adachi United States
Asako Tsubouchi Japan
Wolfgang Knabe Germany
Chuntao Dan relative to Edward M. Rogers United States Edward M. Rogers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Edward M. Rogers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chuntao Dan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chuntao Dan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chuntao Dan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chuntao Dan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chuntao Dan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chuntao Dan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chuntao Dan. The network helps show where Chuntao Dan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Chuntao Dan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chuntao Dan Line = papers co-authored together Chuntao Dan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown

About Chuntao Dan

Chuntao Dan is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cell Biology, Genetics, Molecular Biology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 6 papers that have together received 604 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (2 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (1 paper), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (1 paper), Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ (1 paper), Insect Utilization and Effects (1 paper), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (1 paper) and Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (243 citations), Cell Biology (161 citations), Immunology and Allergy (39 citations), Molecular Biology (291 citations) and Genetics (116 citations). Chuntao Dan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Audrey Minden, April Kelly, Ora Bernard, Niharika Nath, Vivek Jayaraman, Ann M. Hermundstad, Brad K. Hulse, Gerald M. Rubin, Ruchi Parekh and Hannah Haberkern. Their work appears in journals such as eLife, Developmental Cell, Neuron, Molecular and Cellular Biology and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact