Chung-Tsen Tsao
- Management Science and Operations Research top 1%
- Statistics and Probability top 1%
- Control and Systems Engineering top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Strategy and Management
- Co-authors
- Ta‐Chung ChuYeou-Ren Shiue
- Topics
- Fuzzy Systems and Optimization (14 papers)Multi-Criteria Decision Making (14 papers)Optimization and Mathematical Programming (9 papers)
- Cited by
- Management Science and Operations ResearchStatistics and ProbabilityControl and Systems Engineering
- Journals
- Expert Systems with ApplicationsComputers & Operations ResearchComputers & Mathematics with Applications
- Partner nations
- Taiwan
In The Last Decade
Chung-Tsen Tsao
14 papers receiving 493 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Management Science and Operations Research 470
- Statistics and Probability 311
- Control and Systems Engineering 251
- Artificial Intelligence 101
- Strategy and Management 40
Countries citing papers authored by Chung-Tsen Tsao
This map shows the geographic impact of Chung-Tsen Tsao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chung-Tsen Tsao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chung-Tsen Tsao more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chung-Tsen Tsao
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chung-Tsen Tsao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chung-Tsen Tsao. The network helps show where Chung-Tsen Tsao may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chung-Tsen Tsao
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chung-Tsen Tsao. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chung-Tsen Tsao based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chung-Tsen Tsao. Chung-Tsen Tsao is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | An Interval Arithmetic Approach for Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making | 3 |
| 10 | 400 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 12 |
About Chung-Tsen Tsao
Chung-Tsen Tsao is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Management Science and Operations Research and Control and Systems Engineering, having authored 14 papers that have together received 552 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fuzzy Systems and Optimization (14 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (14 papers) and Optimization and Mathematical Programming (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (470 citations), Statistics and Probability (311 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (251 citations). Chung-Tsen Tsao has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Ta‐Chung Chu and Yeou-Ren Shiue. Their work appears in journals such as Expert Systems with Applications, Computers & Operations Research and Computers & Mathematics with Applications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.