Chungen Xing
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Cancer Research top 2%
- Oncology top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Topics
- Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (28 papers)MicroRNA in disease regulation (15 papers)RNA modifications and cancer (14 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Chungen Xing
106 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Molecular Biology 1.3k
- Cancer Research 1.0k
- Oncology 470
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 218
- Epidemiology 208
Countries citing papers authored by Chungen Xing
This map shows the geographic impact of Chungen Xing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chungen Xing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chungen Xing more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chungen Xing
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chungen Xing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chungen Xing. The network helps show where Chungen Xing may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chungen Xing
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chungen Xing. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chungen Xing based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chungen Xing. Chungen Xing is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | Cancer stage-dependent alterations in cell-free DNA in patients with colorectal cancer | 5 |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | LncRNA FTX Contributes to the Progression of Colorectal Cancer Through Regulating miR-192-5p/EIF5A2 Axis | 1 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | Expression of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 and ATP-binding cassette superfamily G member 2 is enhanced in primary foci and metastatic lymph node from patients with triple-negative breast cancer | 11 |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 43 | |
| 19 | 36 | |
| 20 | 19 |
About Chungen Xing
Chungen Xing is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Oncology and Molecular Biology, having authored 111 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (28 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (15 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (1.0k citations), Molecular Biology (1.3k citations) and Oncology (470 citations). Chungen Xing has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Tong Liu, Lihua Chen, Ran Guo, Xiaodong Yang, Yong Wu, Xiaohui Xu, Kui Zhao, Yecheng Li, Zhaohui Huang and Leyuan Zhou. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.