Chun-Chieh Lien
About
In The Last Decade
Chun-Chieh Lien
2 papers receiving 525 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Biomaterials 440
- Rehabilitation 178
- Biomedical Engineering 100
- Plant Science 78
- Materials Chemistry 44
Countries citing papers authored by Chun-Chieh Lien
This map shows the geographic impact of Chun-Chieh Lien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chun-Chieh Lien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chun-Chieh Lien more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chun-Chieh Lien
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chun-Chieh Lien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chun-Chieh Lien. The network helps show where Chun-Chieh Lien may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chun-Chieh Lien
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chun-Chieh Lien. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chun-Chieh Lien based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chun-Chieh Lien. Chun-Chieh Lien is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose–chitosan membranes for wound dressing applications breakdown → | 533 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.