Christopher Williams

866 total citations
37 papers, 454 citations indexed

About

Christopher Williams is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Christopher Williams has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 454 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in General Health Professions, 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Christopher Williams's work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (10 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers) and Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers). Christopher Williams is often cited by papers focused on Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (10 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers) and Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers). Christopher Williams collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Christopher Williams's co-authors include Emma Pitchforth, Mark Chilvers, Andrew Rutman, Chris O’Callaghan, Christopher O’Callaghan, Helen C. Roberts, Simon Conroy, James David van Oppen, Eilís Keeble and D C Linch and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine and Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Christopher Williams

30 papers receiving 427 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Christopher Williams United Kingdom 11 148 93 70 65 48 37 454
David Cheng United States 16 57 0.4× 82 0.9× 92 1.3× 62 1.0× 72 1.5× 64 791
Joyce Chan United States 10 196 1.3× 38 0.4× 140 2.0× 14 0.2× 28 0.6× 13 458
Alies Maybee Canada 8 197 1.3× 34 0.4× 66 0.9× 30 0.5× 59 1.2× 18 441
Rebecca Carlson United States 16 91 0.6× 50 0.5× 94 1.3× 25 0.4× 39 0.8× 58 638
Sue Armitage United Kingdom 14 162 1.1× 32 0.3× 59 0.8× 13 0.2× 12 0.3× 27 436
Katarina Sjövall Sweden 13 134 0.9× 59 0.6× 128 1.8× 14 0.2× 35 0.7× 36 457
Greg Williams United Kingdom 14 139 0.9× 29 0.3× 60 0.9× 62 1.0× 37 0.8× 38 548
Morgan Johnson United States 13 63 0.4× 47 0.5× 52 0.7× 9 0.1× 25 0.5× 51 444
Lisa Di Prospero Canada 11 204 1.4× 49 0.5× 142 2.0× 12 0.2× 25 0.5× 70 713
Evelyn Sutton Canada 15 93 0.6× 22 0.2× 160 2.3× 35 0.5× 20 0.4× 26 533

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Williams. The network helps show where Christopher Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Williams. Christopher Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Howick, Jeremy, et al.. (2025). A Transition Course to Reverse Empathy Decline in Medical Students. The Clinical Teacher. 22(4). e70138–e70138.
2.
Williams, Christopher, et al.. (2025). Deteriorating care home residents as ‘matter out of place’ in both care homes and hospitals: An ethnographic study. Social Science & Medicine. 373. 118012–118012.
3.
Huang, Yi, et al.. (2025). Clinically relevant dosing of miR-145 micelles curbs atherosclerosis in vivo. Journal of Controlled Release. 384. 113930–113930.
4.
Williams, Christopher, et al.. (2024). Oral medroxyprogesterone acetate for the use of ovulation suppression in in vitro fertilization: a cohort trial. Fertility and Sterility. 121(5). 806–813. 2 indexed citations
6.
Pickard, Susan, Victoria Cluley, Surinder K. Sharma, et al.. (2024). Diversity and “Successful Aging”: Exploring Intersectional and Existential Dimensions to Aging Well. The Gerontologist. 65(1).
7.
Gauthier, P., et al.. (2023). The extent and quality of evidence for osteopathic education: A scoping review. International journal of osteopathic medicine. 49. 100663–100663. 8 indexed citations
8.
Armstrong, Natalie, et al.. (2022). ‘Weighing up risks’: a model of care home staff decision-making about potential resident hospital transfers. Age and Ageing. 51(7). 9 indexed citations
9.
Williams, Christopher, et al.. (2022). Hospital transfers from care homes: conceptualising staff decision-making as a form of risk work. Health Risk & Society. 24(7-8). 317–335. 2 indexed citations
10.
Armstrong, Natalie, et al.. (2021). Using advance and emergency care plans during transfer decisions: A grounded theory interview study with care home staff. Palliative Medicine. 36(1). 200–207. 10 indexed citations
11.
Williams, Christopher, et al.. (2021). Assessing tropical cyclone contribution to annual global rainfall. Open MIND.
12.
Gordon, Adam, et al.. (2020). Protocol for a realist review of General Practitioners’ Role in Advancing Practice in Care Homes (GRAPE study). BMJ Open. 10(6). e036221–e036221. 5 indexed citations
13.
Jameson, Molly M., et al.. (2019). Which near-patient tests might improve the diagnosis of UTI in older people in urgent care settings? A mapping review and consensus process. European Geriatric Medicine. 10(5). 707–720. 1 indexed citations
14.
Levene, Louis S, et al.. (2018). Predicting declines in perceived relationship continuity using practice deprivation scores: a longitudinal study in primary care. British Journal of General Practice. 68(671). e420–e426. 37 indexed citations
15.
Blaikie, Andrew, et al.. (2016). Arclight: a pocket ophthalmoscope for the 21st century. BMJ. 355. i6637–i6637. 13 indexed citations
16.
Williams, Christopher, et al.. (2010). Understanding Delay in Accessing Specialist Emergency Eye Care in a Developing Country: Eye Trauma in Tanzania. Ophthalmic Epidemiology. 17(2). 103–112. 28 indexed citations
17.
Chilvers, Mark, et al.. (2009). Diagnostic Testing of Patients Suspected of Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 181(4). 307–314. 91 indexed citations
18.
Williams, Christopher & Farzaneh Yazdani. (2009). The Rehabilitation Paradox: Street-Working Children in Afghanistan. Diaspora Indigenous and Minority Education. 3(1). 4–20. 1 indexed citations
19.
Ablah, Elizabeth, et al.. (2008). Community Health Centers and Emergency Preparedness: An Assessment of Competencies and Training Needs. Journal of Community Health. 33(4). 241–247. 24 indexed citations
20.
Badylak, Stephen F., et al.. (1988). Simple canine model of arterial thrombosis with endothelial injury suitable for investigation of thrombolytic agents. Journal of Pharmacological Methods. 19(4). 293–304. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026