Christopher Schütze

1.1k citations
27 papers · 837 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher Schütze

25 papers receiving 812 citations

Peers

Christopher Schütze
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Ophthalmology 700
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 564
  • Biophysics 99
  • Biomedical Engineering 315
  • Molecular Biology 139
Replace C. Ahlers with:
C. Ahlers Austria
Jeff Fingler United States
Ferdinand Georg Schlanitz Austria
Lindsey S. Folio United States
Kari V. Vienola United States
Kelly A. Townsend United States
I. Golbaz Austria
David E. Lederer Canada
Bryan K. Monson United States
Christopher Schütze relative to C. Ahlers Austria C. Ahlers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
C. Ahlers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Schütze

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Schütze's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Schütze with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Schütze more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Schütze

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Schütze. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Schütze. The network helps show where Christopher Schütze may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Schütze, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Schütze Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Schütze links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012121
2 201097
3 201086
4 201575
5 201063
6 200852
7 201151
8 201244
9 200943
10 201033
11 201230
12 201418
13 201917
14 201017
15 201116
16 201815
17 201015
18 20189
19 20117
20 20097

About Christopher Schütze

Christopher Schütze is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 837 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (20 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (16 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (10 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (10 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (5 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (4 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (3 papers) and Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (700 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (564 citations), Biophysics (99 citations), Biomedical Engineering (315 citations) and Molecular Biology (139 citations). Christopher Schütze has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Switzerland and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Ursula Schmidt‐Erfurth, Bernhard Baumann, Michael Pircher, Christoph K. Hitzenberger, Erich Götzinger, C. Ahlers, Ferdinand Georg Schlanitz, I. Golbaz, Harald Sattmann and Franz Prager. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Eye, Retina, Biomedical Optics Express and Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact