Christopher Preece

1.1k total citations
59 papers, 797 citations indexed

About

Christopher Preece is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Building and Construction and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Christopher Preece has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 797 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 25 papers in Building and Construction and 22 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Christopher Preece's work include Construction Project Management and Performance (33 papers), BIM and Construction Integration (17 papers) and Value Engineering and Management (10 papers). Christopher Preece is often cited by papers focused on Construction Project Management and Performance (33 papers), BIM and Construction Integration (17 papers) and Value Engineering and Management (10 papers). Christopher Preece collaborates with scholars based in United Arab Emirates, Malaysia and Iran. Christopher Preece's co-authors include Heap‐Yih Chong, N.J.T. Smith, AbdulLateef Olanrewaju, Sajad Rezaei, Ehsan Saghatforoush, Rory Padfield, Effie Papargyropoulou, Wan Khairuzzaman Wan Ismail, Hamidah Mohd Saman and Abdul Aziz and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Sustainability and Sustainable Cities and Society.

In The Last Decade

Christopher Preece

55 papers receiving 762 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Christopher Preece United Arab Emirates 15 439 434 213 93 90 59 797
Jay Yang Australia 16 310 0.7× 462 1.1× 133 0.6× 80 0.9× 144 1.6× 64 827
Roshana Takim Malaysia 15 401 0.9× 331 0.8× 288 1.4× 99 1.1× 84 0.9× 46 757
B.A.K.S. Perera Sri Lanka 16 514 1.2× 413 1.0× 282 1.3× 62 0.7× 132 1.5× 134 899
Martin Morgan Tuuli United Kingdom 16 420 1.0× 267 0.6× 268 1.3× 73 0.8× 110 1.2× 42 822
Faisal Manzoor Arain Singapore 16 588 1.3× 450 1.0× 158 0.7× 84 0.9× 91 1.0× 42 841
Abimbola Windapo South Africa 20 511 1.2× 521 1.2× 257 1.2× 77 0.8× 178 2.0× 98 1.0k
Temitope Omotayo United Kingdom 19 243 0.6× 412 0.9× 253 1.2× 51 0.5× 70 0.8× 58 810
Michael Atafo Adabre Hong Kong 14 274 0.6× 652 1.5× 201 0.9× 93 1.0× 172 1.9× 24 1.1k
Ayman Ahmed Ezzat Othman Egypt 21 560 1.3× 623 1.4× 278 1.3× 47 0.5× 160 1.8× 76 1.1k
Chika Udeaja United Kingdom 14 320 0.7× 372 0.9× 280 1.3× 56 0.6× 71 0.8× 52 771

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Preece

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Preece's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Preece with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Preece more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Preece

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Preece. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Preece. The network helps show where Christopher Preece may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Preece

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Preece. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Preece based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Preece. Christopher Preece is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Preece, Christopher, et al.. (2022). Developing Applicable Scenarios to Install and Utilize Solar Panels in the Houses of Abu Dhabi City. Sustainability. 14(22). 15361–15361. 2 indexed citations
3.
Preece, Christopher, et al.. (2021). Evaluating the Environmental Performance of 3D Printed Shelters in Jordan. 26(2). 117–134. 4 indexed citations
4.
Olanrewaju, AbdulLateef, et al.. (2021). Evaluation of measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19 on the construction sites. Cleaner Engineering and Technology. 5. 100277–100277. 44 indexed citations
5.
Jeffery, Laura, et al.. (2021). Sustainable Township and Sustainable Home: Public Perceptions. 5(3). 331–347. 1 indexed citations
6.
Saad, Nor Hayati, et al.. (2021). Programme Outcome Attributes related to Complex Engineering Problem Capability: Perceptions of Engineering Students in Malaysia. Asian Journal of University Education. 17(4). 95–95. 2 indexed citations
7.
Preece, Christopher, et al.. (2020). Development of Psychomotor Skill and Programme Outcome Attainment of Civil Engineering Students in Malaysia. 1(2). 9–24. 5 indexed citations
8.
Saghatforoush, Ehsan, et al.. (2019). A practical framework to facilitate constructability implementation using the integrated project delivery approach: a case study. International Journal of Construction Management. 22(7). 1225–1239. 11 indexed citations
9.
Saghatforoush, Ehsan, et al.. (2019). Integrated Project Delivery Implementation Challenges in the Construction Industry. Civil Engineering Journal. 5(8). 1672–1683. 19 indexed citations
10.
Saghatforoush, Ehsan, et al.. (2017). Research Trends on Benefits of Implementing Constructability, Operability, and Maintainability.. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(2). 55–62. 3 indexed citations
11.
Preece, Christopher, et al.. (2017). Value conflicts and organizational commitment of internal construction stakeholders. Engineering Construction & Architectural Management. 24(4). 554–574. 22 indexed citations
12.
Sadeghi, Haleh, et al.. (2016). REVIEWING THE USEFULNESS OF BIM ADOPTION IN IMPROVING SAFETY ENVIRONMENT OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. Jurnal Teknologi. 78(10). 16 indexed citations
13.
Preece, Christopher, et al.. (2015). Predictor Role of Profession in Explaining Personal Value Priorities and Conflicts between Construction Stakeholders. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1 indexed citations
14.
Preece, Christopher, et al.. (2015). Predictor Role of Profession in Explaining Personal Value Priorities and Conflicts between Construction Stakeholders. Construction Economics and Building. 15(4). 45–62. 5 indexed citations
15.
Chong, Heap‐Yih & Christopher Preece. (2014). Improving Construction Procurement Systems using Organizational Strategies. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica. 11(1). 10 indexed citations
16.
Mohandes, Saeed Reza, Christopher Preece, & Haleh Sadeghi. (2014). Enhancing the Functionality on the Interior Space within the Buildings through Using Building Information Modeling (BIM). 4 indexed citations
17.
Preece, Christopher, et al.. (2013). Enhancing planning and scheduling program by using benefits of bim-based applications. Journals & Books Hosting (International Knowledge Sharing Platform). 3(5). 41–48. 13 indexed citations
18.
Papargyropoulou, Effie, Rory Padfield, Harrison Odion Ikhumhen, & Christopher Preece. (2012). The rise of sustainability services for the built environment in Malaysia. Sustainable Cities and Society. 5. 44–51. 30 indexed citations
19.
Papargyropoulou, Effie, et al.. (2011). Sustainable construction waste management in Malaysia: A contractor's perspective. 18 indexed citations
20.
Papargyropoulou, Effie, et al.. (2011). Developing and marketing sustainable construction services. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026