Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Pig latin
20081.2k citationsChristopher Olston, Benjamin Reed et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Olston
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Olston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Olston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Olston more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Olston
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Olston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Olston. The network helps show where Christopher Olston may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Olston
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Olston.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Olston based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Olston. Christopher Olston is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Halevy, Alon, Flip Korn, Natalya F. Noy, et al.. (2016). Goods. 795–806.107 indexed citations
3.
Chin, Brian, Daniel von Dincklage, Vuk Ercegovac, et al.. (2015). Yedalog: Exploring Knowledge at Scale. DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics). 32. 78.13 indexed citations
4.
Olston, Christopher & Anish Das Sarma. (2011). Ibis: A Provenance Manager for Multi-Layer Systems.. Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research. 152–159.4 indexed citations
5.
Olston, Christopher, et al.. (2011). Nova. 1081–1090.82 indexed citations
6.
Morton, Kristi, Magdalena Bałazińska, Dan Grossman, & Christopher Olston. (2011). The case for being lazy. 1–6.2 indexed citations
Olston, Christopher & Marc Najork. (2010). Web Crawling. now publishers, Inc. eBooks.11 indexed citations
9.
Olston, Christopher, Edward Bortnikov, Khaled Elmeleegy, Flavio Junqueira, & Benjamin Reed. (2009). Interactive Analysis of Web-Scale Data.. Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research.18 indexed citations
García-Molina, Héctor, et al.. (2007). Configurations. 332–333.1 indexed citations
15.
Olston, Christopher & Jennifer Widom. (2005). Efficient Monitoring and Querying of Distributed, Dynamic Data via Approximate Replication.. IEEE Data(base) Engineering Bulletin. 28. 11–18.22 indexed citations
16.
García-Molina, Héctor, et al.. (2005). Configurations: Understanding Alternatives for Safeguarding Data.3 indexed citations
Olston, Christopher & Ed H.. (2003). ScentTrails. interactions. 10(5). 9–10.16 indexed citations
20.
Olston, Christopher & Allison Woodruff. (2002). Getting portals to behave. 15–25.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.