Christopher M. Wright

32 papers receiving 760 citations

Peers

Christopher M. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 221
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 27
  • Automotive Engineering 110
  • Spectroscopy 104
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 350
Replace Shucheng Xu with:
Shucheng Xu United States
Xiaopan Li China
Kendra Letchworth‐Weaver United States
M. Veillerot France
Charles C. Badcock United States
Zdeněk Zelinger Czechia
Sofia Trakhtenberg United States
R. P. Gunawardane Sri Lanka
Michael Ertl Germany
Sungho Han United States
Christopher M. Wright relative to Shucheng Xu United States Shucheng Xu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Shucheng Xu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher M. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher M. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher M. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher M. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher M. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher M. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher M. Wright. The network helps show where Christopher M. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher M. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher M. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Christopher M. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021210
2 2021147
3 201748
4 199945
5 199841
6 199830
7 201727
8 201625
9 202022
10 201619
11 198318
12 201915
13 201615
14 201913
15 200113
16 201313
17 199911
18 199910
19 20179
20 19709

About Christopher M. Wright

Christopher M. Wright is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Spectroscopy, Materials Chemistry, Atmospheric Science and Organic Chemistry, having authored 34 papers that have together received 787 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (17 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (11 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (10 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (5 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (4 papers), Radioactive contamination and transfer (3 papers), Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (3 papers) and Layered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (221 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (27 citations), Automotive Engineering (110 citations), Spectroscopy (104 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (350 citations). Christopher M. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Seyyed Shayan Meysami, J. Barker, Ashish Rudola, Ruth Sayers, Richard Heap, Anthony J. R. Rennie, Francesco Mazzali, E. F. van Dishoeck, Dermot O’Hare and Jean‐Charles Buffet. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Science and Global Security, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Molecular Catalysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact