Christopher Kee
Impact in
- Law top 5%
- European and International Contract Law
-
- International Arbitration and Investment Law
- Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Papers in
-
- International Arbitration and Investment Law 6
- Dispute Resolution and Class Actions 1
- Law 4
- European and International Contract Law 4
- Journals
- Asia Pacific Law Review (1 paper)Journal of International Arbitration (1 paper)Oxford University Press eBooks (1 paper)Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (3 papers)Deakin Law Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandAustraliaHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Christopher Kee
9 papers receiving 39 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 12
- Law 27
- Strategy and Management 34
- Accounting 14
- Political Science and International Relations 26
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 7
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Kee
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Kee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Kee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Kee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Kee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Kee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Kee. The network helps show where Christopher Kee may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Kee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 22 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 5 | The Art of Argument: A Guide to Mooting | 2007 | 3 |
| 6 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 9 | Remarks on the manner in which the unidroit principles may be used to interpret or supplement article 48 of the CISG | 2004 | 1 |
| 10 | International Arbitration and Security for Costs : a Brief Report on Two Developments | 2008 | 0 |
| 11 | 2008 | 0 |
About Christopher Kee
Christopher Kee is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Law, Accounting, Political Science and International Relations and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 11 papers that have together received 55 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Arbitration and Investment Law (6 papers), European and International Contract Law (4 papers), Law, logistics, and international trade (3 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (3 papers), Dispute Resolution and Class Actions (1 paper), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (1 paper) and Taxation and Legal Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (27 citations), Strategy and Management (34 citations), Accounting (14 citations), Political Science and International Relations (26 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (7 citations). Christopher Kee has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Australia and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Ingeborg Schwenzer and Pascal Hachem. Their work appears in journals such as Asia Pacific Law Review, Journal of International Arbitration, Oxford University Press eBooks, Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) and Deakin Law Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.