Christopher J. O’Bryan
- Ecology top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law top 5%
- Co-authors
- James WatsonAlexander BraczkowskiHawthorne L. BeyerEve McDonald‐MaddenHugh P. PossinghamNeil CarterOscar VenterJames R. Allan
- Topics
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (15 papers)Species Distribution and Climate Change (7 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Christopher J. O’Bryan
25 papers receiving 722 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Ecology 493
- Global and Planetary Change 199
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 164
- Ecological Modeling 137
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 100
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher J. O’Bryan
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher J. O’Bryan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher J. O’Bryan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher J. O’Bryan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher J. O’Bryan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher J. O’Bryan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher J. O’Bryan. The network helps show where Christopher J. O’Bryan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher J. O’Bryan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher J. O’Bryan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher J. O’Bryan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher J. O’Bryan. Christopher J. O’Bryan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 57 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 77 | |
| 13 | 37 | |
| 14 | 109 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 154 | |
| 17 | 82 | |
| 18 | Documentation of unusual movement behaviour of the indigo snake Drymarchon couperi (Holbrook, 1842)(Squamata: Colubridae), an upland species, in a pastureland matrix of the USA | 1 |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | Further presence of ranavirus infection in amphibian populations of Tennessee, USA | 2 |
About Christopher J. O’Bryan
Christopher J. O’Bryan is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Ecology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 27 papers that have together received 729 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (15 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (7 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (137 citations), Ecology (493 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (164 citations). Christopher J. O’Bryan has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include James Watson, Alexander Braczkowski, Hawthorne L. Beyer, Eve McDonald‐Madden, Hugh P. Possingham, Neil Carter, Oscar Venter, James R. Allan, Moreno Di Marco and Matthew Holden. Their work appears in journals such as Global Change Biology, Ecology Letters and PLoS Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.