Christopher Danbury
Impact in
-
- Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
-
- Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Papers in
-
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 5
- Patient Dignity and Privacy 2
-
- Ethics in medical practice 5
- Co-authors
- Christopher Newdick (3 shared papers)C. Waldmann (1 shared paper)Alex Ruck Keene (2 shared papers)Anne Pohrt (1 shared paper)Eldar Søreide (1 shared paper)Alexander Avidan (1 shared paper)Claire Phillips (1 shared paper)Adrian Wong (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of the Intensive Care Society (4 papers)Journal of Medical Ethics (2 papers)Journal of Critical Care (1 paper)Medical Law Review (1 paper)BMJ (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomPortugalUnited States
In The Last Decade
Christopher Danbury
13 papers receiving 84 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Pharmacy 16
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 14
- Health Information Management 11
- Research and Theory 2
- General Health Professions 43
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Danbury
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Danbury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Danbury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Danbury more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Danbury
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Danbury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Danbury. The network helps show where Christopher Danbury may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Danbury, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 31 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 20 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 0 |
About Christopher Danbury
Christopher Danbury is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology and Pharmacy, having authored 15 papers that have together received 90 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (6 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Ethics in medical practice (5 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (3 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (2 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (2 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (16 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (14 citations), Health Information Management (11 citations), Research and Theory (2 citations) and General Health Professions (43 citations). Christopher Danbury has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and United States. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Newdick, C. Waldmann, Alex Ruck Keene, Anne Pohrt, Eldar Søreide, Alexander Avidan, Claire Phillips, Adrian Wong, Laurą Galarza and Paulo Maia. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Intensive Care Society, Journal of Medical Ethics, Journal of Critical Care, Medical Law Review and BMJ.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.