Christopher C. Gates

400 total citations
8 papers, 324 citations indexed

About

Christopher C. Gates is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Oncology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Christopher C. Gates has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 324 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 3 papers in Oncology and 2 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Christopher C. Gates's work include Family Support in Illness (4 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers). Christopher C. Gates is often cited by papers focused on Family Support in Illness (4 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers). Christopher C. Gates collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Christopher C. Gates's co-authors include Benjamin J. Murawski, Madeline H. Schmitt, Gary R. Morrow, Arthur H. Schmale, Jimmie C. Holland, Doris Penman, Michael Feldstein, Nick Melisaratos, Leonard R. Derogatis and Allen J. Enelow and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Cancer and Psychosomatic Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Christopher C. Gates

8 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Christopher C. Gates United States	6	179	138	98	59	48	8	324
Hindi T. Mermelstein United States	7	181 1.0×	121 0.9×	89 0.9×	89 1.5×	54 1.1×	9	397
Steven H. Herman United States	8	169 0.9×	58 0.4×	111 1.1×	66 1.1×	59 1.2×	10	356
Marianne Omne-Pontén Sweden	10	211 1.2×	99 0.7×	144 1.5×	56 0.9×	120 2.5×	11	455
M Ojanen Finland	7	161 0.9×	55 0.4×	64 0.7×	40 0.7×	64 1.3×	8	373
Jim Lemon Australia	9	120 0.7×	74 0.5×	72 0.7×	29 0.5×	25 0.5×	12	370
B. Nausheen United Kingdom	7	143 0.8×	58 0.4×	79 0.8×	48 0.8×	89 1.9×	8	353
Tatsuro Nakanishi Japan	7	313 1.7×	180 1.3×	129 1.3×	96 1.6×	48 1.0×	15	420
Leah Curran Australia	6	153 0.9×	95 0.7×	77 0.8×	55 0.9×	58 1.2×	8	428
Caroline Séguin Leclair Canada	7	209 1.2×	103 0.7×	92 0.9×	45 0.8×	60 1.3×	9	356
Bernard Desclaux France	5	193 1.1×	110 0.8×	55 0.6×	51 0.9×	50 1.0×	12	311

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher C. Gates

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher C. Gates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher C. Gates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher C. Gates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher C. Gates

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher C. Gates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher C. Gates. The network helps show where Christopher C. Gates may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher C. Gates

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher C. Gates. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher C. Gates based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher C. Gates. Christopher C. Gates is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Copsey, Bethan, Alexandra Wright‐Hughes, Amanda Farrin, et al.. (2024). Randomised controlled trial of a psychotherapeutic intervention to improve quality of life and other outcomes in people who repeatedly self-harm: FReSH START study protocol. Trials. 25(1). 564–564. 2 indexed citations

2.

Penman, Doris, Mary R. Cook, Jimmie C. Holland, et al.. (1987). The Impact of Mastectomy on Self-Concept and Social Function. Women & Health. 11(3-4). 101–130. 74 indexed citations

3.

Schmale, Arthur H., et al.. (1983). Well-Being of Cancer Survivors. Psychosomatic Medicine. 45(2). 163–169. 83 indexed citations

4.

Gates, Christopher C.. (1982). Book ReviewBreast Cancer: The psychological effects of the disease and its treatment. New England Journal of Medicine. 307(22). 1410–1410. 1 indexed citations

5.

Morrow, Gary R., Michael Feldstein, Leonard R. Derogatis, et al.. (1981). Development of brief measures of psychosocial adjustment to medical illness applied to cancer patients. General Hospital Psychiatry. 3(2). 79–88. 28 indexed citations

6.

Gates, Christopher C.. (1980). Husbands of mastectomy patients. 2(1). 38–41. 14 indexed citations

7.

Gates, Christopher C.. (1980). Cancer: The behavioural dimensions. Social Science & Medicine Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology. 14(2). 173–174. 13 indexed citations

8.

Derogatis, Leonard R., Michael Feldstein, Nick Melisaratos, et al.. (1979). A survey of psychotropic drug prescriptions in an oncology population. Cancer. 44(5). 1919–1929. 109 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact