Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Infinite Chiral Symmetry in Four Dimensions
2015316 citationsChristopher Beem, Madalena Lemos et al.Communications in Mathematical Physicsprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Beem
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Beem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Beem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Beem more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Beem
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Beem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Beem. The network helps show where Christopher Beem may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Beem
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Beem.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Beem based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Beem. Christopher Beem is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Beem, Christopher, Leonardo Rastelli, & Balt C. van Rees. (2017). More N=4 superconformal bootstrap. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).60 indexed citations
Beem, Christopher, Madalena Lemos, Pedro Liendo, Leonardo Rastelli, & Balt C. van Rees. (2016). The N=2 superconformal bootstrap. Durham Research Online (Durham University).80 indexed citations
11.
Beem, Christopher, Madalena Lemos, Leonardo Rastelli, & Balt C. van Rees. (2016). The (2, 0) superconformal bootstrap. Physical review. D. 93(2).111 indexed citations
Beem, Christopher, Wolfger Peelaers, Leonardo Rastelli, & Balt C. van Rees. (2015). Chiral algebras of class S. Durham Research Online (Durham University).82 indexed citations
14.
Beem, Christopher, Madalena Lemos, Pedro Liendo, et al.. (2015). Infinite Chiral Symmetry in Four Dimensions. Communications in Mathematical Physics. 336(3). 1359–1433.316 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Beem, Christopher, Leonardo Rastelli, Ashoke Sen, & Balt C. van Rees. (2014). Resummation and S-duality in N = 4 SYM. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2014(4).20 indexed citations
16.
Beem, Christopher, Leonardo Rastelli, & Balt C. van Rees. (2013). N=4Superconformal Bootstrap. Physical Review Letters. 111(7). 71601–71601.152 indexed citations
17.
Anderson, Michael T., Christopher Beem, Nikolay Bobev, & Leonardo Rastelli. (2013). Holographic Uniformization. Communications in Mathematical Physics. 318(2). 429–471.18 indexed citations
18.
Bah, Ibrahima, Christopher Beem, Nikolay Bobev, & Brian Wecht. (2012). AdS/CFT dual pairs from M5-branes on Riemann surfaces. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 85(12).56 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.