Christopher Anagnostis

586 total citations
10 papers, 454 citations indexed

About

Christopher Anagnostis is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Christopher Anagnostis has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 454 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Pharmacology, 9 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 3 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Christopher Anagnostis's work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (10 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (9 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers). Christopher Anagnostis is often cited by papers focused on Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (10 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (9 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers). Christopher Anagnostis collaborates with scholars based in United States. Christopher Anagnostis's co-authors include Robert J. Gatchel, Tom G. Mayer, Janice Keeley, Timothy Proctor, Randy Neblett, Donald D. McGeary, Jeffrey Dersh and Don McGeary and has published in prestigious journals such as Spine and The Spine Journal.

In The Last Decade

Christopher Anagnostis

9 papers receiving 429 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Christopher Anagnostis United States	8	383	165	86	75	62	10	454
Greg McIntosh Canada	8	374 1.0×	189 1.1×	61 0.7×	74 1.0×	61 1.0×	16	422
Krysia Dziedzic United Kingdom	8	373 1.0×	138 0.8×	128 1.5×	105 1.4×	80 1.3×	11	529
Petra Saur Germany	5	473 1.2×	236 1.4×	136 1.6×	138 1.8×	60 1.0×	14	570
Cristin Jouve United States	9	450 1.2×	265 1.6×	142 1.7×	88 1.2×	103 1.7×	12	535
H Hurri Finland	10	276 0.7×	97 0.6×	55 0.6×	49 0.7×	37 0.6×	16	378
Monica Unsgaard‐Tøndel Norway	9	352 0.9×	124 0.8×	51 0.6×	85 1.1×	113 1.8×	14	413
Carol Hartigan United States	12	602 1.6×	307 1.9×	116 1.3×	146 1.9×	121 2.0×	19	718
Audrey Long United States	6	535 1.4×	290 1.8×	120 1.4×	102 1.4×	114 1.8×	11	583
Pieter H. Helmhout Netherlands	13	287 0.7×	132 0.8×	120 1.4×	75 1.0×	95 1.5×	30	533
U. Rytökoski Finland	10	524 1.4×	324 2.0×	111 1.3×	143 1.9×	116 1.9×	15	629

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Anagnostis

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Anagnostis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Anagnostis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Anagnostis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Anagnostis

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Anagnostis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Anagnostis. The network helps show where Christopher Anagnostis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Anagnostis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Anagnostis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Anagnostis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Anagnostis. Christopher Anagnostis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Mayer, Tom G., Robert J. Gatchel, Janice Keeley, et al.. (2004). A Randomized Clinical Trial of Treatment for Lumbar Segmental Rigidity. Spine. 29(20). 2199–2205. 40 indexed citations

2.

McGeary, Donald D., Tom G. Mayer, Robert J. Gatchel, & Christopher Anagnostis. (2004). Smoking status and psychosocioeconomic outcomes of functional restoration in patients with chronic spinal disability. The Spine Journal. 4(2). 170–175. 12 indexed citations

3.

Anagnostis, Christopher, Robert J. Gatchel, & Tom G. Mayer. (2004). The Pain Disability Questionnaire. Spine. 29(20). 2290–2302. 146 indexed citations

4.

Anagnostis, Christopher, Robert J. Gatchel, & Tom G. Mayer. (2004). P61. The newest and psychometrically strongest measure of functional status: the pain disability questionnaire. The Spine Journal. 4(5). S67–S67. 1 indexed citations

5.

McGeary, Donald D., Tom G. Mayer, Robert J. Gatchel, Christopher Anagnostis, & Timothy Proctor. (2003). Gender-related differences in treatment outcomes for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. The Spine Journal. 3(3). 197–203. 49 indexed citations

6.

Anagnostis, Christopher, Tom G. Mayer, Robert J. Gatchel, & Timothy Proctor. (2003). The Million Visual Analog Scale. Spine. 28(10). 1051–1060. 50 indexed citations

7.

Neblett, Randy, et al.. (2003). Quantifying the Lumbar Flexion–Relaxation Phenomenon. Spine. 28(13). 1435–1446. 120 indexed citations

8.

Anagnostis, Christopher, Tom G. Mayer, Robert J. Gatchel, & Timothy Proctor. (2003). . Spine. 28(10). 1051–1060. 3 indexed citations

9.

Neblett, Randy, et al.. (2003). . Spine. 28(13). 1435–1446. 7 indexed citations

10.

Mayer, Tom G., et al.. (2002). Impact of functional restoration after anterior cervical fusion on chronic disability in work-related neck pain. The Spine Journal. 2(4). 267–273. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact