Christoph Piechaczek
- Molecular Biology
- Surgery top 5%
- Genetics top 2%
- Genetics top 10%
- Biomaterials top 5%
- Co-authors
- Hans J. LippsJuergen BodeJeannette M. MoebiusNan MaGustav SteinhoffArmin BaikerChristof StammLee‐Lee Ong
- Topics
- Mesenchymal stem cell research (8 papers)Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (7 papers)Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (7 papers)
- Cited by
- GeneticsHepatologyBiomaterials
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Christoph Piechaczek
20 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Molecular Biology 636
- Surgery 550
- Genetics 542
- Genetics 236
- Biomaterials 218
Countries citing papers authored by Christoph Piechaczek
This map shows the geographic impact of Christoph Piechaczek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christoph Piechaczek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christoph Piechaczek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christoph Piechaczek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christoph Piechaczek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christoph Piechaczek. The network helps show where Christoph Piechaczek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christoph Piechaczek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christoph Piechaczek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christoph Piechaczek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christoph Piechaczek. Christoph Piechaczek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 35 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 26 | |
| 6 | 95 | |
| 7 | 362 | |
| 8 | 59 | |
| 9 | 36 | |
| 10 | 65 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | Expression of the Putative Stem Cell Marker CD133 in the Human Eye | 1 |
| 13 | 181 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 49 | |
| 17 | Differentiation of adult CD133+ cells isolated from peripheral blood into cells with a neural phenotype | 1 |
| 18 | CD133. | 6 |
| 19 | 113 | |
| 20 | 166 |
About Christoph Piechaczek
Christoph Piechaczek is a scholar working on Genetics, Biomaterials and Immunology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mesenchymal stem cell research (8 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (7 papers) and Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (542 citations), Hepatology (162 citations) and Biomaterials (218 citations). Christoph Piechaczek has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Hans J. Lipps, Juergen Bode, Jeannette M. Moebius, Nan Ma, Gustav Steinhoff, Armin Baiker, Christof Stamm, Lee‐Lee Ong, Wenzhong Li and Ren‐Ke Li. Their work appears in journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Nature Cell Biology and Cardiovascular Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.