Christine Windemuth-Kieselbach
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Oncology
- Clinical Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Andreas ReifMonika HeineKlaus‐Peter LeschAstrid DempfleChristian JacobJ. BöningBurkhard BrockeArmin Schmidtke
- Topics
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer (3 papers)Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (3 papers)Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Christine Windemuth-Kieselbach
17 papers receiving 388 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Psychiatry and Mental health 167
- Oncology 131
- Clinical Psychology 82
- Cognitive Neuroscience 76
- Molecular Biology 50
Countries citing papers authored by Christine Windemuth-Kieselbach
This map shows the geographic impact of Christine Windemuth-Kieselbach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christine Windemuth-Kieselbach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christine Windemuth-Kieselbach more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christine Windemuth-Kieselbach
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christine Windemuth-Kieselbach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christine Windemuth-Kieselbach. The network helps show where Christine Windemuth-Kieselbach may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christine Windemuth-Kieselbach
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christine Windemuth-Kieselbach. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christine Windemuth-Kieselbach based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christine Windemuth-Kieselbach. Christine Windemuth-Kieselbach is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 42 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 53 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 170 |
About Christine Windemuth-Kieselbach
Christine Windemuth-Kieselbach is a scholar working on Family Practice, Otorhinolaryngology and Oncology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 396 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (3 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (3 papers) and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (167 citations), Oncology (131 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (76 citations). Christine Windemuth-Kieselbach has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Reif, Monika Heine, Klaus‐Peter Lesch, Astrid Dempfle, Christian Jacob, J. Böning, Burkhard Brocke, Armin Schmidtke, Anja Kruse and H. Schäfer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Blood and Cancer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.