Christine Elder

1.1k total citations
6 papers, 75 citations indexed

About

Christine Elder is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiation and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Christine Elder has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 75 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 3 papers in Radiation and 3 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Christine Elder's work include Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (3 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers). Christine Elder is often cited by papers focused on Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (3 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers). Christine Elder collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, Canada and Australia. Christine Elder's co-authors include Rebecca Wong, Andrea Bezjak, Tony Panzarella, Graham Stevens, Angela Rezo, Greg Wheeler, Marketa Skala, Brent Chesson, Michael McLean and Marijana Vanevski and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Annals of Oncology and Journal of Thoracic Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Christine Elder

6 papers receiving 75 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Christine Elder New Zealand	4	40	35	33	25	14	6	75
L. Ciurlionis United Kingdom	6	72 1.8×	40 1.1×	61 1.8×	19 0.8×	7 0.5×	7	118
Maureen Nolan Canada	4	18 0.5×	28 0.8×	18 0.5×	14 0.6×	40 2.9×	6	75
Spencer Thompson United States	6	35 0.9×	18 0.5×	19 0.6×	48 1.9×	20 1.4×	15	106
F. Koetsveld Netherlands	5	53 1.3×	35 1.0×	98 3.0×	10 0.4×	10 0.7×	11	116
Nina Boje Kibsgaard Jensen Denmark	5	76 1.9×	29 0.8×	54 1.6×	53 2.1×	28 2.0×	9	161
Emiel J.C. Sturm Belgium	5	18 0.5×	23 0.7×	31 0.9×	26 1.0×	20 1.4×	5	94
P. Mackenzie Australia	5	14 0.3×	9 0.3×	23 0.7×	12 0.5×	10 0.7×	13	44
Julia Henderson United Kingdom	7	20 0.5×	27 0.8×	16 0.5×	83 3.3×	19 1.4×	16	141
Katarina Majerčáková Spain	6	57 1.4×	25 0.7×	60 1.8×	43 1.7×	9 0.6×	15	132
Levon Igidbashian Canada	6	44 1.1×	71 2.0×	42 1.3×	39 1.6×	23 1.6×	16	134

Countries citing papers authored by Christine Elder

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christine Elder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christine Elder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christine Elder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christine Elder

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christine Elder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christine Elder. The network helps show where Christine Elder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christine Elder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christine Elder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christine Elder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christine Elder. Christine Elder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

Ball, David, Gang Mai, Shalini Vinod, et al.. (2018). Quality of life in the CHISEL randomized trial of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) versus standard radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group 09.02). Annals of Oncology. 29. ix139–ix139. 1 indexed citations

Ball, Daniel, Shalini Vinod, Scott Babington, et al.. (2017). MA 13.07 A Randomized Trial of SABR vs Conventional Radiotherapy for Inoperable Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: TROG09.02 (CHISEL). Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 12(11). S1853–S1853. 26 indexed citations

Wong, Rebecca, D. Létourneau, David Fitzpatrick, et al.. (2012). A One-Step Cone-Beam CT-Enabled Planning-to-Treatment Model for Palliative Radiotherapy-From Development to Implementation. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 84(3). 834–840. 21 indexed citations

Stevens, Graham, et al.. (2012). Comparison of recommendations for radiotherapy from two contemporaneous thoracic multidisciplinary meeting formats: co‐located and video conference. Internal Medicine Journal. 42(11). 1213–1218. 11 indexed citations

Panzarella, Tony, et al.. (2010). Quantifying Interobserver Variation in Target Definition in Palliative Radiotherapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 80(5). 1498–1504. 14 indexed citations

Elder, Christine, et al.. (2005). Towards a One-Step Scan and Treat Process for Palliative Radiotherapy - a Potential Application for Cone Beam Computerized Tomography (CBCT). International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 63. S440–S441. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact