Chris Stokel-Walker
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 0.02%
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
-
- Online Learning and Analytics
Papers in
-
- Misinformation and Its Impacts 6
-
- Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection 4
- Journals
- BMJ (37 papers)Nature (9 papers)Scientific American (1 paper)The New Scientist (35 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Chris Stokel-Walker
65 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Chris Stokel-Walker's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
- Health Informatics 929
- Computer Science Applications 143
- Safety Research 194
- Family Practice 34
- Artificial Intelligence 528
Countries citing papers authored by Chris Stokel-Walker
This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Stokel-Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Stokel-Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Stokel-Walker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Stokel-Walker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Stokel-Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Stokel-Walker. The network helps show where Chris Stokel-Walker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Chris Stokel-Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove Hit paper breakdown → | 2023 | 540 |
| 2 | What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science Hit paper breakdown → | 2023 | 489 |
| 3 | AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays — should professors worry? Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 358 |
| 4 | 2021 | 41 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 15 | The Revolution Will Be Tweeted | 2011 | 8 |
| 16 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 4 |
About Chris Stokel-Walker
Chris Stokel-Walker is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence, Infectious Diseases, General Health Professions and Information Systems, having authored 83 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (9 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (6 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (5 papers), Social Media in Health Education (5 papers), COVID-19 diagnosis using AI (5 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (5 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (4 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Challenges (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (929 citations), Computer Science Applications (143 citations), Safety Research (194 citations), Family Practice (34 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (528 citations). Chris Stokel-Walker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard Van Noorden and Elisabeth Mahase. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ, Nature, Scientific American and The New Scientist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.