Chris R. Hogg

687 citations
16 papers · 505 indexed · h-index 12

Chris R. Hogg

15 papers receiving 497 citations

Peers

Chris R. Hogg
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Ophthalmology 310
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 112
  • Molecular Biology 344
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 107
  • Epidemiology 95
Replace Jonathan Aboshiha with:
Jonathan Aboshiha United Kingdom
Florence Rigaudière France
Gerald A. Fishman United States
Melissa A. Wilk United States
Ditta Zobor Germany
Maria van Genderen Netherlands
G.E. Holder United Kingdom
B. Masella United States
Nashila Hirji United Kingdom
Mohamed A. Genead United States
Chris R. Hogg relative to Jonathan Aboshiha United Kingdom Jonathan Aboshiha's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Jonathan Aboshiha · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chris R. Hogg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chris R. Hogg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris R. Hogg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris R. Hogg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chris R. Hogg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris R. Hogg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris R. Hogg. The network helps show where Chris R. Hogg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chris R. Hogg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chris R. Hogg Line = papers co-authored together Chris R. Hogg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201922
2 20155
3 20140
4 2013115
5
Autosomal dominant Best disease with an unusual electrooculographic light rise and risk of angle-closure glaucoma: a clinical and molecular genetic study.
201119
6 200885
7 200813
8 200732
9 200630
10 200641
11 20047
12 200434
13 200339
14 199411
15
A survey of color discrimination in German ophthalmologists. Changes associated with the use of lasers and operating microscopes.
199130
16 199122

About Chris R. Hogg

Chris R. Hogg is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Neurology and Sensory Systems, having authored 16 papers that have together received 505 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (12 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (4 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (2 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (2 papers) and Ocular and Laser Science Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (310 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (112 citations) and Molecular Biology (344 citations). Chris R. Hogg has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Graham E. Holder, Anthony G. Robson, M. Neveu, Andrew R. Webster, Anthony T. Moore, G. B. Arden, Michel Michaelides, Alison Davis, John J. Sloper and Alan C. Bird. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Advances in experimental medicine and biology and Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026