Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Learning to rank using gradient descent
20051.7k citationsChris Burges, Erin Renshaw et al.profile →
This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Burges's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Burges with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Burges more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Burges. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Burges. The network helps show where Chris Burges may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chris Burges
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chris Burges.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chris Burges based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Chris Burges. Chris Burges is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tsai, Chen-Tse, Wen-tau Yih, Chris Burges, & Scott Yih. (2015). Web-based Question Answering: Revisiting AskMSR.5 indexed citations
2.
Burges, Chris, Léon Bottou, Max Welling, Zoubin Ghahramani, & Kilian Q. Weinberger. (2014). Advances in neural information processing systems 26: 27th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2013: December 5-10, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, USA.1 indexed citations
3.
Burges, Chris, Léon Bottou, Max Welling, Zoubin Ghahramani, & Kilian Q. Weinberger. (2013). Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems - Volume 1.1 indexed citations
Zweig, Geoffrey & Chris Burges. (2012). A Challenge Set for Advancing Language Modeling. North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 29–36.18 indexed citations
6.
Pereira, Francisco B., Chris Burges, Léon Bottou, & Kilian Q. Weinberger. (2012). Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.174 indexed citations
7.
Dönmez, Pınar, Krysta M. Svore, & Chris Burges. (2008). On the Optimality of LambdaRank. Meat Science. 66(1). 18–54.3 indexed citations
8.
Li, Ping, Chris Burges, & Qiang Wu. (2008). Learning to Rank Using Classification and Gradient Boosting.34 indexed citations
Burges, Chris, P. Simard, & H.S. Malvar. (2001). Improving Wavelet Compression with Neural Networks. 486.5 indexed citations
17.
Schölkopf, Bernhard, Chris Burges, & AJ Smola. (1999). Introduction to support vector learning. International Conference on Neural Information Processing. 1–15.30 indexed citations
Schölkopf, Bernhard, Chris Burges, Federico Girosi, et al.. (1997). Comparing support vector machines with Gaussian kernels to radial basis function classifiers. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. 45(11). 2758–2765.1001 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.