Chris Ackerley
Impact in
-
- Samuel Beckett and Modernism
- Modernist Literature and Criticism
- French Literature and Criticism
- Philosophy top 5%
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
- Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence
Papers in
-
- Samuel Beckett and Modernism 18
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism 1
- Philosophy 14
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 13
- Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence 9
- Journals
- Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui (7 papers)Journal of the Australasian Universities Language and Literature Association (2 papers)Evidence & Policy (1 paper)Journal of Beckett Studies (7 papers)Classiques GARNIER (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Chris Ackerley
17 papers receiving 34 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 15
- Literature and Literary Theory 75
- Philosophy 67
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 23
- Museology 1
- Cultural Studies 2
Countries citing papers authored by Chris Ackerley
This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Ackerley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Ackerley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Ackerley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Ackerley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Ackerley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Ackerley. The network helps show where Chris Ackerley may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Chris Ackerley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Grove Companion to Samuel Beckett: A Reader's Guide to His Works, Life, and Thought | 2004 | 34 |
| 2 | 2010 | 12 | |
| 3 | 1994 | 5 | |
| 4 | 1993 | 4 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1995 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 18 | LASSATA SED: Samuel Beckett's Portraits of his Fair to Middling Women | 2016 | 1 |
| 19 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 0 |
About Chris Ackerley
Chris Ackerley is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 24 papers that have together received 84 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Samuel Beckett and Modernism (18 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (13 papers), Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence (9 papers), Theatre and Performance Studies (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Vladimir Nabokov Literary Studies (1 paper), Literature, Language, and Rhetoric Studies (1 paper) and Poetry Analysis and Criticism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (75 citations), Philosophy (67 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (23 citations), Museology (1 citation) and Cultural Studies (2 citations). Chris Ackerley has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include S. E. Gontarski and Ellen Balka. Their work appears in journals such as Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, Journal of the Australasian Universities Language and Literature Association, Evidence & Policy, Journal of Beckett Studies and Classiques GARNIER.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.