Chong‐En Bai
- Economics and Econometrics top 0.5%
- Accounting top 1%
- Strategy and Management top 2%
- Finance top 1%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 2%
- Co-authors
- Zhigang TaoJiangyong LuChang‐Tai HsiehYijiang WangYingyi QianDavid LiZheng SongBinzhen Wu
- Topics
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (24 papers)Corporate Finance and Governance (19 papers)Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAmerican Economic ReviewThe Economic Journal
- Partner nations
- Hong KongUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Chong‐En Bai
69 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Economics and Econometrics 1.3k
- Accounting 1.1k
- Strategy and Management 678
- Finance 495
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 382
Countries citing papers authored by Chong‐En Bai
This map shows the geographic impact of Chong‐En Bai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chong‐En Bai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chong‐En Bai more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chong‐En Bai
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chong‐En Bai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chong‐En Bai. The network helps show where Chong‐En Bai may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chong‐En Bai
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chong‐En Bai. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chong‐En Bai based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chong‐En Bai. Chong‐En Bai is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 105 | |
| 7 | 124 | |
| 8 | Determinants of undergraduate GPAs in China: college entrance examination scores, high school achievement, and admission route | 3 |
| 9 | 81 | |
| 10 | Is co-skewness a better measure of risk in the downside than downside beta? Evidence in emerging market data | 3 |
| 11 | 172 | |
| 12 | 176 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | Ownership, Incentives and Monitoring | 1 |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | Agency in Project Screening and Termination Decisions: Why is Good Money Thrown after Bad | 3 |
| 20 | 2 |
About Chong‐En Bai
Chong‐En Bai is a scholar working on Accounting, Economics and Econometrics and Finance, having authored 70 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (24 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (19 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (1.1k citations), Finance (495 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (1.3k citations). Chong‐En Bai has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Zhigang Tao, Jiangyong Lu, Chang‐Tai Hsieh, Yijiang Wang, Yingyi Qian, David Li, Zheng Song, Binzhen Wu, Qi Li and Min Ouyang. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Economic Review and The Economic Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.