Chong Won Bak
About
In The Last Decade
Chong Won Bak
14 papers receiving 285 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Reproductive Medicine 142
- Molecular Biology 86
- Urology 74
- Genetics 69
- Surgery 64
Countries citing papers authored by Chong Won Bak
This map shows the geographic impact of Chong Won Bak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chong Won Bak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chong Won Bak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chong Won Bak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chong Won Bak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chong Won Bak. The network helps show where Chong Won Bak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chong Won Bak
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chong Won Bak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chong Won Bak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chong Won Bak. Chong Won Bak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 38 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 47 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 46 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 17 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.