Chong Weng
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Neural dynamics and brain function 10
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 9
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 3
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 6
- Sensory Systems top 10%
-
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 9
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries 3
- Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy 3
-
- Retinal Development and Disorders 3
- Co-authors
- José‐Manuel AlonsoJianzhong JinChun-I YehGarrett B. StanleyNicholas A. LesicaDaniel A. ButtsCarl R. StoelzelEdward S. Ruthazer
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaCanada
In The Last Decade
Chong Weng
20 papers receiving 996 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Cognitive Neuroscience 724
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 454
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 165
- Sensory Systems 32
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 57
Countries citing papers authored by Chong Weng
This map shows the geographic impact of Chong Weng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chong Weng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chong Weng more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chong Weng
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chong Weng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chong Weng. The network helps show where Chong Weng may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chong Weng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 11 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 78 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 8 | [Use sagittal reconstruction CT for making decisions regarding the surgical strategy for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament]. | 2012 | 4 |
| 9 | 2011 | 38 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 56 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 24 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 27 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 53 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 133 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 89 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 291 | |
| 18 | 2006 | 25 | |
| 19 | 2006 | 69 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 33 |
About Chong Weng
Chong Weng is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (10 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (9 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (9 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (6 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (3 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers) and Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (724 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (454 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (165 citations). Chong Weng has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include José‐Manuel Alonso, Jianzhong Jin, Chun-I Yeh, Garrett B. Stanley, Nicholas A. Lesica, Daniel A. Butts, Carl R. Stoelzel, Edward S. Ruthazer, Harvey A. Swadlow and Joshua A. Gordon. Their work appears in journals such as Spine, Journal of Neurophysiology, PLoS Biology, European Spine Journal and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.