Chobok Kim

1.6k total citations
32 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Chobok Kim is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Chobok Kim has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 15 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 4 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Chobok Kim's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (17 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (11 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers). Chobok Kim is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (17 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (11 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers). Chobok Kim collaborates with scholars based in South Korea, United States and Bulgaria. Chobok Kim's co-authors include Nathan F. Johnson, Brian T. Gold, Jeounghoon Kim, Charles D. Smith, Richard J. Kryscio, James K. Kroger, Alison Bailey, Jody L. Clasey, Vince D. Calhoun and Vincent P. Clark and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, NeuroImage and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Chobok Kim

30 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Chobok Kim South Korea 13 920 222 199 180 140 32 1.2k
Huixia Zhou China 12 500 0.5× 301 1.4× 128 0.6× 178 1.0× 81 0.6× 49 845
Markus H. Sneve Norway 19 1.0k 1.1× 174 0.8× 74 0.4× 181 1.0× 237 1.7× 45 1.3k
Hannes Noack Germany 12 528 0.6× 306 1.4× 79 0.4× 174 1.0× 96 0.7× 20 886
Robert S. Blumenfeld United States 13 1.4k 1.5× 209 0.9× 114 0.6× 269 1.5× 119 0.8× 16 1.6k
Christian Chicherio Switzerland 19 667 0.7× 204 0.9× 97 0.5× 305 1.7× 69 0.5× 32 1.1k
Jordan E. Pierce United States 14 340 0.4× 106 0.5× 176 0.9× 153 0.8× 128 0.9× 36 796
Kymberly D. Young United States 20 1.2k 1.3× 504 2.3× 273 1.4× 223 1.2× 151 1.1× 41 1.7k
Kyoichi Nakajima Japan 7 1.3k 1.4× 197 0.9× 112 0.6× 209 1.2× 88 0.6× 10 1.5k
Lars Bäckman Sweden 6 510 0.6× 354 1.6× 137 0.7× 170 0.9× 54 0.4× 13 835
Hedvig Söderlund Sweden 18 556 0.6× 122 0.5× 166 0.8× 154 0.9× 95 0.7× 25 826

Countries citing papers authored by Chobok Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chobok Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chobok Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chobok Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chobok Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chobok Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chobok Kim. The network helps show where Chobok Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chobok Kim

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chobok Kim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chobok Kim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chobok Kim. Chobok Kim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Heo, Juyeon, et al.. (2023). The role of the prefrontal cortex in semantic control for selecting weakly associated meanings in creative idea generation. Neuroscience Letters. 802. 137177–137177. 4 indexed citations
2.
Heo, Juyeon, et al.. (2022). The role of the right prefrontal cortex in the retrieval of weak representations. Scientific Reports. 12(1). 4537–4537. 5 indexed citations
3.
Kroger, James K. & Chobok Kim. (2022). Frontopolar Cortex Specializes for Manipulation of Structured Information. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 16. 788395–788395. 8 indexed citations
4.
Kim, Chobok, et al.. (2020). Dissociable neural correlates of spatial attention and response inhibition in spatially driven interference. Neuroscience Letters. 731. 135111–135111. 4 indexed citations
5.
Kim, Chobok, et al.. (2019). The role of frontopolar cortex in the individual differences in conflict adaptation. Neuroscience Letters. 705. 212–218. 8 indexed citations
6.
Lee, Woojin, et al.. (2018). Comparative Analysis of the System Thinking between Underrepresented and General Students: An Exploratory Study. SECONDARY EDUCATION RESEARCH. 66(1). 307–327.
7.
Kim, Chobok, James K. Kroger, Vince D. Calhoun, & Vincent P. Clark. (2015). The role of the frontopolar cortex in manipulation of integrated information in working memory. Neuroscience Letters. 595. 25–29. 42 indexed citations
8.
Kim, Chobok, et al.. (2015). Neural correlates of cognitive style and flexible cognitive control. NeuroImage. 113. 78–85. 19 indexed citations
9.
Lee, Sungjun, et al.. (2014). Development of an auditory emotion recognition function using psychoacoustic parameters based on the International Affective Digitized Sounds. Behavior Research Methods. 47(4). 1076–1084. 8 indexed citations
10.
Kim, Chobok, et al.. (2013). Task-dependent response conflict monitoring and cognitive control in anterior cingulate and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices. Brain Research. 1537. 216–223. 16 indexed citations
11.
Kim, Chobok, Nathan F. Johnson, & Brian T. Gold. (2013). Conflict adaptation in prefrontal cortex: Now you see it, now you don't. Cortex. 50. 76–85. 48 indexed citations
12.
Gold, Brian T., Chobok Kim, Nathan F. Johnson, Richard J. Kryscio, & Charles D. Smith. (2013). Lifelong Bilingualism Maintains Neural Efficiency for Cognitive Control in Aging. Journal of Neuroscience. 33(2). 387–396. 264 indexed citations
13.
Kim, Chobok, Nathan F. Johnson, & Brian T. Gold. (2012). Common and distinct neural mechanisms of attentional switching and response conflict. Brain Research. 1469. 92–102. 27 indexed citations
14.
Johnson, Nathan F., Chobok Kim, & Brian T. Gold. (2012). Socioeconomic status is positively correlated with frontal white matter integrity in aging. AGE. 35(6). 2045–2056. 30 indexed citations
15.
Kim, Chobok, et al.. (2012). Conflict adjustment through domain-specific multiple cognitive control mechanisms. Brain Research. 1444. 55–64. 32 indexed citations
16.
Kim, Chobok, et al.. (2011). Common and Distinct Mechanisms of Cognitive Flexibility in Prefrontal Cortex. Journal of Neuroscience. 31(13). 4771–4779. 155 indexed citations
17.
Kim, Chobok, et al.. (2011). Domain general and domain preferential brain regions associated with different types of task switching: A Meta‐Analysis. Human Brain Mapping. 33(1). 130–142. 236 indexed citations
18.
Johnson, Nathan F., Chobok Kim, Jody L. Clasey, Alison Bailey, & Brian T. Gold. (2011). Cardiorespiratory fitness is positively correlated with cerebral white matter integrity in healthy seniors. NeuroImage. 59(2). 1514–1523. 126 indexed citations
19.
Kim, Chobok, et al.. (2010). Multiple cognitive control mechanisms associated with the nature of conflict. Neuroscience Letters. 476(3). 156–160. 49 indexed citations
20.
Kim, Chobok, James K. Kroger, & Jeounghoon Kim. (2010). A functional dissociation of conflict processing within anterior cingulate cortex. Human Brain Mapping. 32(2). 304–312. 62 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026