Chi‐Wei Tsai
- Plant Science top 2%
- Insect Science top 1%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Infectious Diseases top 5%
- Co-authors
- Y C ChengShin-Lian DoongRaymond F. SchinaziDennis C. LiottaRodrigo P. P. AlmeidaSaskia A. HogenhoutMargaret G. RedinbaughKent M. Daane
- Topics
- Plant Virus Research Studies (25 papers)Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (18 papers)Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- TaiwanUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Chi‐Wei Tsai
57 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Plant Science 867
- Insect Science 557
- Epidemiology 395
- Molecular Biology 384
- Infectious Diseases 355
Countries citing papers authored by Chi‐Wei Tsai
This map shows the geographic impact of Chi‐Wei Tsai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chi‐Wei Tsai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chi‐Wei Tsai more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chi‐Wei Tsai
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chi‐Wei Tsai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chi‐Wei Tsai. The network helps show where Chi‐Wei Tsai may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chi‐Wei Tsai
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chi‐Wei Tsai. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chi‐Wei Tsai based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chi‐Wei Tsai. Chi‐Wei Tsai is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 119 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 58 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | Study of citrus Huanglongbing and its complex infection with Citrus tristeza closterovirus and Citrus tatter leaf capillovirus in Taiwan. | 1 |
| 16 | 50 | |
| 17 | 35 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | Volatile Pheromone Detection and Calling Behavior Exhibition: Secondary Mate-finding Strategy of the German Cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.) | 6 |
About Chi‐Wei Tsai
Chi‐Wei Tsai is a scholar working on Horticulture, Insect Science and Plant Science, having authored 59 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Virus Research Studies (25 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (18 papers) and Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (104 citations), Insect Science (557 citations) and Endocrinology (202 citations). Chi‐Wei Tsai has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Y C Cheng, Shin-Lian Doong, Raymond F. Schinazi, Dennis C. Liotta, Rodrigo P. P. Almeida, Saskia A. Hogenhout, Margaret G. Redinbaugh, Kent M. Daane, El‐Desouky Ammar and G. D. Hsiung. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Clinical Investigation and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.