Chitoshi Goto

33 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers

Chitoshi Goto
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 44
  • Family Practice 12
  • Pharmacology 56
  • Toxicology 13
  • Infectious Diseases 39
Replace Heleen van der Sijs with:
Heleen van der Sijs Netherlands
Osamu Imakyure Japan
F. Lagrange France
Molouk Hadjibabaie Iran
Cyril Breuker France
Maria Tavakoli‐Ardakani Iran
L. Beretz France
Haleh Rezaee Iran
Sabrina W. Cole United States
Mònica Sabaté Spain
Chitoshi Goto relative to Heleen van der Sijs Netherlands Heleen van der Sijs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Heleen van der Sijs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chitoshi Goto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chitoshi Goto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chitoshi Goto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chitoshi Goto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chitoshi Goto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chitoshi Goto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chitoshi Goto. The network helps show where Chitoshi Goto may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chitoshi Goto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chitoshi Goto Line = papers co-authored together Chitoshi Goto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200954
2 201545
3 201823
4 201215
5 202013
6 201613
7 201713
8 199212
9 20158
10 19887
11 20067
12 20077
13 20197
14 20185
15 20185
16 20203
17 20133
18 20033
19 20143
20 19933

About Chitoshi Goto

Chitoshi Goto is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Economics and Econometrics, Oncology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 36 papers that have together received 271 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmacy and Medical Practices (18 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (10 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (4 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (2 papers), Radical Photochemical Reactions (2 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers) and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (44 citations), Family Practice (12 citations), Pharmacology (56 citations), Toxicology (13 citations) and Infectious Diseases (39 citations). Chitoshi Goto has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Hitomi Teramachi, Tomoya Tachi, Masahiro Yasuda, Yoshihiro Noguchi, Teruo Tsuchiya, Kazuhide Tanaka, Takashi Niwa, Takumi Nakada, Yoshinori Itoh and Senji Kasahara. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Frontiers in Pharmacology, PLoS ONE, SpringerPlus and Tetrahedron Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact