Chingkuang Tu
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Organic Chemistry top 2%
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 0.5%
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Co-authors
- David N. SilvermanRobert McKennaPhilip J. LaipisB JönssonCecilia ForsmanSven LindskogS. Zoë FisherL. Govindasamy
- Topics
- Enzyme function and inhibition (81 papers)Chemical Reactions and Mechanisms (31 papers)Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions (24 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of the American Chemical SocietyJournal of Biological Chemistry
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Chingkuang Tu
100 papers receiving 3.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Molecular Biology 2.7k
- Organic Chemistry 1.1k
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 749
- Pharmacology 475
- Cell Biology 290
Countries citing papers authored by Chingkuang Tu
This map shows the geographic impact of Chingkuang Tu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chingkuang Tu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chingkuang Tu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chingkuang Tu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chingkuang Tu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chingkuang Tu. The network helps show where Chingkuang Tu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chingkuang Tu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chingkuang Tu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chingkuang Tu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chingkuang Tu. Chingkuang Tu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 26 | |
| 3 | 51 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 29 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | 91 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 40 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About Chingkuang Tu
Chingkuang Tu is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Organic Chemistry and Molecular Biology, having authored 101 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Enzyme function and inhibition (81 papers), Chemical Reactions and Mechanisms (31 papers) and Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (749 citations), Molecular Biology (2.7k citations) and Organic Chemistry (1.1k citations). Chingkuang Tu has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include David N. Silverman, Robert McKenna, Philip J. Laipis, B Jönsson, Cecilia Forsman, Sven Lindskog, S. Zoë Fisher, L. Govindasamy, Mavis Agbandje‐McKenna and David M. Duda. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.