Ching‐Hsing Wang

444 total citations
30 papers, 262 citations indexed

About

Ching‐Hsing Wang is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ching‐Hsing Wang has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 262 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 17 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 9 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Ching‐Hsing Wang's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (16 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (9 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers). Ching‐Hsing Wang is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (16 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (9 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers). Ching‐Hsing Wang collaborates with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Australia. Ching‐Hsing Wang's co-authors include Fang‐Yu Lin, Aldo F. Ponce, Yuan Hsiao, Costas Panagopoulos, Mark P. Jones, M. C. Sunny Wong and Jim Granato and has published in prestigious journals such as BMC Public Health, Social Science Quarterly and Electoral Studies.

In The Last Decade

Ching‐Hsing Wang

25 papers receiving 252 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ching‐Hsing Wang United States 8 150 84 55 46 45 30 262
Andrea Pedrazzani Italy 11 149 1.0× 255 3.0× 51 0.9× 60 1.3× 44 1.0× 44 418
Erik Gahner Larsen United Kingdom 12 207 1.4× 203 2.4× 55 1.0× 15 0.3× 43 1.0× 26 428
Leah Windsor United States 11 143 1.0× 61 0.7× 19 0.3× 19 0.4× 35 0.8× 33 339
Riccardo Ladini Italy 8 150 1.0× 34 0.4× 53 1.0× 71 1.5× 30 0.7× 25 232
Masha Krupenkin United States 5 201 1.3× 178 2.1× 22 0.4× 30 0.7× 133 3.0× 8 332
Marina Ghersetti Sweden 8 255 1.7× 62 0.7× 57 1.0× 28 0.6× 173 3.8× 14 407
Paolo Segatti Italy 10 256 1.7× 218 2.6× 42 0.8× 52 1.1× 39 0.9× 46 415
Tristan Sturm United Kingdom 9 174 1.2× 26 0.3× 21 0.4× 40 0.9× 13 0.3× 29 294
Stéphane J. Baele United Kingdom 13 362 2.4× 100 1.2× 56 1.0× 16 0.3× 106 2.4× 35 521
Dan Cassino United States 9 151 1.0× 54 0.6× 30 0.5× 47 1.0× 31 0.7× 25 245

Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐Hsing Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐Hsing Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐Hsing Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐Hsing Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐Hsing Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐Hsing Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐Hsing Wang. The network helps show where Ching‐Hsing Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ching‐Hsing Wang

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ching‐Hsing Wang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ching‐Hsing Wang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ching‐Hsing Wang. Ching‐Hsing Wang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Panagopoulos, Costas & Ching‐Hsing Wang. (2025). Rationality, affect, and vote choice. Frontiers in Political Science. 7.
2.
Hsiao, Yuan, et al.. (2023). Politics matters for individual attitudes toward vaccine donation: cross-national evidence from the United States and Taiwan. Globalization and Health. 19(1). 40–40. 2 indexed citations
3.
Wang, Ching‐Hsing. (2023). The effects of personality traits on individual attitudes toward internet sensationalized politics. Political Science. 75(3). 257–280.
4.
Wang, Ching‐Hsing, et al.. (2022). Political trust and attitudes toward civil disobedience: evidence from Taiwan. Democratization. 29(7). 1346–1366. 2 indexed citations
5.
Wang, Ching‐Hsing, et al.. (2020). Personality traits and the propensity to protest: a cross-national analysis. Asian Journal of Political Science. 29(1). 22–41. 7 indexed citations
6.
Lin, Fang‐Yu & Ching‐Hsing Wang. (2020). Personality and individual attitudes toward vaccination: a nationally representative survey in the United States. BMC Public Health. 20(1). 1759–1759. 48 indexed citations
7.
Wang, Ching‐Hsing, et al.. (2019). Correction to: Personality Traits and Individual Attitudes Toward Same-Sex-Marriage: Evidence from Taiwan. Sexuality Research and Social Policy. 17(3). 541–541.
8.
Wang, Ching‐Hsing, et al.. (2019). Personality traits and political participation in Taiwan: a mediation approach. Political Science. 71(3). 175–192. 8 indexed citations
9.
Wang, Ching‐Hsing, et al.. (2018). Does candidate nomination in districts increase party votes of small parties? Evidence from the 2016 Taiwan legislative elections. Japanese Journal of Political Science. 19(3). 461–473. 2 indexed citations
10.
Wang, Ching‐Hsing, et al.. (2017). Personality Traits and Voter Turnout in South Korea: The Mediation Argument. Japanese Journal of Political Science. 18(3). 426–445. 4 indexed citations
11.
Wang, Ching‐Hsing, et al.. (2017). The Effects of Civic Consciousness and Civil Disobedience on Support for and Participation in Contentious Politics. Japanese Journal of Political Science. 18(2). 313–335. 4 indexed citations
12.
Wang, Ching‐Hsing. (2016). Political trust, civic duty and voter turnout: The Mediation argument. The Social Science Journal. 53(3). 291–300. 10 indexed citations
13.
Wang, Ching‐Hsing. (2016). Personality traits, political attitudes and vote choice: Evidence from the United States. Electoral Studies. 44. 26–34. 26 indexed citations
14.
Wang, Ching‐Hsing. (2016). Gender Differences in the Effects of Personality Traits on Party Identification in the United States. Journal of Women Politics & Policy. 38(3). 335–362. 2 indexed citations
15.
Jones, Mark P., et al.. (2015). The Texas Voter ID Law and the 2014 Election: A Study of Texas's 23rd Congressional District. 3 indexed citations
16.
Wang, Ching‐Hsing. (2015). Social Networks, Interpersonal Trust, and Support for Democracy in East Asia. International Journal of Social Science Studies. 3(2).
17.
Granato, Jim, et al.. (2015). EITM: An assessment with an application to economic voting. Electoral Studies. 40. 372–393. 2 indexed citations
18.
Wang, Ching‐Hsing. (2015). A Deeper Look at the Relationship between Political Knowledge and Political Participation: Evidence from Presidential and Legislative Elections in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Political Science. 23(3). 397–419. 5 indexed citations
19.
Wang, Ching‐Hsing. (2015). Government Performance, Corruption, and Political Trust in East Asia*. Social Science Quarterly. 97(2). 211–231. 59 indexed citations
20.
Wang, Ching‐Hsing. (2012). The effects of party fractionalization and party polarization on democracy. Party Politics. 20(5). 687–699. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026