Ching Kit Chen

489 citations
32 papers · 298 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Ching Kit Chen

30 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers

Ching Kit Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 145
  • Transplantation 14
  • Epidemiology 108
  • Surgery 112
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 31
Replace Stewart Hunter with:
Stewart Hunter United Kingdom
Rawa Arif Germany
Carlen A. Gomez United States
Ali Hage Canada
Michael Keller United States
M. Richardson Australia
Luigi D’Orsogna Australia
Rob J. de Winter Netherlands
Henriëtte ter Heide Netherlands
Peace C. Madueme United States
Ching Kit Chen relative to Stewart Hunter United Kingdom Stewart Hunter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×
Stewart Hunter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ching Kit Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching Kit Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching Kit Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching Kit Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching Kit Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching Kit Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching Kit Chen. The network helps show where Ching Kit Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ching Kit Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ching Kit Chen Line = papers co-authored together Ching Kit Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202137
2 201826
3 201324
4 201523
5 201519
6 201817
7 201416
8 202116
9 201515
10 201513
11 201712
12 200612
13 201310
14 20229
15 20218
16 20216
17 20215
18 20215
19 20184
20 20224

About Ching Kit Chen

Ching Kit Chen is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Transplantation and Surgery, having authored 32 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (12 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (8 papers), Congenital heart defects research (5 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (4 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (3 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (3 papers), Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation (3 papers) and Abdominal Trauma and Injuries (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (145 citations), Transplantation (14 citations), Epidemiology (108 citations), Surgery (112 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (31 citations). Ching Kit Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tingsen Benson Lim, Choon Hwai Yap, Brian W. McCrindle, Cedric Manlhiot, Citra Nurfarah Zaini Mattar, Cameron Slorach, Luc Mertens, Mark K. Friedberg, Kenneth Tou En Chang and Anne I. Dipchand. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, Frontiers in Pediatrics, Transplantation, Circulation Genomic and Precision Medicine and Developmental Dynamics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026