Chih-Kang Chou
- Surgery top 5%
- Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques 22
- Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques 10
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 5
- Surgical Sutures and Adhesives 3
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Wound Healing and Treatments 3
- Urology top 10%
-
- Bone fractures and treatments 5
-
- Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management 3
-
- Dermatological and COVID-19 studies 2
- Co-authors
- Sin‐Daw LinChung‐Sheng LaiChin-Chiang YangTsai-Ming LinChih‐Cheng TsaiChung‐Hsing ChangMing‐Lung YuYuh‐Min Cheng
- Cited by
- SurgeryRehabilitationTransplantation
- Journals
- Annals of Plastic Surgery (3 papers)Burns (1 paper)British Journal of Plastic Surgery (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- TaiwanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Chih-Kang Chou
27 papers receiving 561 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Surgery 546
- Rehabilitation 75
- Transplantation 17
- Developmental Biology 10
- Urology 29
Countries citing papers authored by Chih-Kang Chou
This map shows the geographic impact of Chih-Kang Chou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chih-Kang Chou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chih-Kang Chou more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chih-Kang Chou
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chih-Kang Chou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chih-Kang Chou. The network helps show where Chih-Kang Chou may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Chih-Kang Chou, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1998 | 11 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 24 | |
| 3 | A mixture of allogeneic dermal tissue and autologous microskin grafting of rabbit skin wound. | 1997 | 1 |
| 4 | Zigzag V-Y advancement flap for medial canthal defect after tumor excision. | 1996 | 1 |
| 5 | 1996 | 22 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 11 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 8 | A clinical analysis of necrotizing fasciitis: a review of 54 cases. | 1995 | 10 |
| 9 | 1994 | 12 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 38 | |
| 11 | The subgalea-periosteal turnover flap for reconstruction of scalp defects. | 1993 | 5 |
| 12 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 68 | |
| 14 | 1992 | 43 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 61 | |
| 16 | 1991 | 21 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 92 | |
| 18 | 1991 | 38 | |
| 19 | 1991 | 14 | |
| 20 | 1990 | 17 |
About Chih-Kang Chou
Chih-Kang Chou is a scholar working on Surgery, Developmental Biology and Rehabilitation, having authored 27 papers that have together received 591 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (22 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (10 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (5 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (3 papers), Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (3 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (3 papers) and Dermatological and COVID-19 studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (546 citations), Rehabilitation (75 citations) and Transplantation (17 citations). Chih-Kang Chou has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sin‐Daw Lin, Chung‐Sheng Lai, Chin-Chiang Yang, Tsai-Ming Lin, Chih‐Cheng Tsai, Chung‐Hsing Chang, Ming‐Lung Yu, Yuh‐Min Cheng, Chin-Kai Tseng and Gau‐Tyan Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Plastic Surgery, Burns, British Journal of Plastic Surgery and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.