Chie‐Pein Chen

2.2k citations
52 papers · 1.5k indexed · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Chie‐Pein Chen

51 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Chie‐Pein Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 486
  • Genetics 239
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 361
  • Reproductive Medicine 74
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 236
Replace N.M. Gude with:
N.M. Gude Australia
Asok Antony United States
Yuji Hiramatsu Japan
Eny Maria Goloni‐Bertollo Brazil
Kui Zhang China
Alexander Strauß Germany
Érika Cristina Pavarino Brazil
Cheng‐Yu Long Taiwan
Rekha Bajoria United Kingdom
Zhaohui Zhong China
Chie‐Pein Chen relative to N.M. Gude Australia N.M. Gude's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
N.M. Gude · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chie‐Pein Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chie‐Pein Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chie‐Pein Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chie‐Pein Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chie‐Pein Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chie‐Pein Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chie‐Pein Chen. The network helps show where Chie‐Pein Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chie‐Pein Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chie‐Pein Chen Line = papers co-authored together Chie‐Pein Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019246
2 200580
3 201075
4 201573
5 200667
6 200960
7 200752
8 201750
9 201049
10 200845
11 201845
12 200743
13 200541
14 201037
15 201432
16 201531
17 201530
18 201027
19 200627
20 199626

About Chie‐Pein Chen

Chie‐Pein Chen is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Transplantation, Immunology and Allergy and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (21 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (9 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (8 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (7 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (6 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (5 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (5 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (486 citations), Genetics (239 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (361 citations), Reproductive Medicine (74 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (236 citations). Chie‐Pein Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Chen‐Yu Chen, Chia‐Chen Chang, Chii‐Wann Lin, Tsung‐Hsien Su, Yuh‐Ming Hwu, Hung‐Sheng Chen, Cheng-Yi Chen, Jian‐Pei Huang, Hung Li and Pei‐Chun Chen. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Oncotarget.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026