Chie Hanaoka
About
In The Last Decade
Chie Hanaoka
7 papers receiving 275 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Sociology and Political Science 140
- Economics and Econometrics 78
- Demography 72
- Soil Science 57
- General Health Professions 49
Countries citing papers authored by Chie Hanaoka
This map shows the geographic impact of Chie Hanaoka's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chie Hanaoka with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chie Hanaoka more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chie Hanaoka
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chie Hanaoka. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chie Hanaoka. The network helps show where Chie Hanaoka may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chie Hanaoka
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chie Hanaoka. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chie Hanaoka based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chie Hanaoka. Chie Hanaoka is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 194 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 70 | |
| 9 | Standard error and confidence interval for QALY weights | 1 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.