U1 snRNP regulates cancer cell migration and invasion in vitro2020 · 5.9k citations
What are hit papers?
Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if any of the following hold:
it has ≥500 total citations;
it reaches ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (the
threshold is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it);
it reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.
2020Nature Communications
Peers
Chie Arai
Comparison fields: 5 of 199
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment678
This map shows the geographic impact of Chie Arai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chie Arai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chie Arai more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chie Arai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chie Arai. The network helps show where Chie Arai may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Chie Arai, linked wherever they have
co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they
share.
Border = papers with Chie AraiLine = papers co-authored togetherChie Arai links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.
All Works
6 of 6 papers shown
#
Work
1
U1 snRNP regulates cancer cell migration and invasion in vitro
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.