Chia‐Hsin Chen
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Rehabilitation top 1%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Surgery top 10%
- Co-authors
- Mao‐Hsiung HuangYan‐Hsiung WangTien‐Wen ChenYi‐Jen ChenMei‐Ling HoMing‐Cheng WengChing‐Lin HsiehMing‐Long Yeh
- Topics
- Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine (15 papers)Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (11 papers)Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (8 papers)
- Cited by
- RehabilitationOrthopedics and Sports MedicinePhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
- Partner nations
- TaiwanUnited StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Chia‐Hsin Chen
103 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 165
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 435
- Rehabilitation 393
- Biomedical Engineering 392
- Pharmacology 338
- Surgery 318
Countries citing papers authored by Chia‐Hsin Chen
This map shows the geographic impact of Chia‐Hsin Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chia‐Hsin Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chia‐Hsin Chen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chia‐Hsin Chen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chia‐Hsin Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chia‐Hsin Chen. The network helps show where Chia‐Hsin Chen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chia‐Hsin Chen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chia‐Hsin Chen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chia‐Hsin Chen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chia‐Hsin Chen. Chia‐Hsin Chen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | 54 | |
| 13 | 47 | |
| 14 | 60 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 78 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 72 | |
| 19 | 41 | |
| 20 | 59 |
About Chia‐Hsin Chen
Chia‐Hsin Chen is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Rehabilitation and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 105 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine (15 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (11 papers) and Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (393 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (307 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (114 citations). Chia‐Hsin Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Mao‐Hsiung Huang, Yan‐Hsiung Wang, Tien‐Wen Chen, Yi‐Jen Chen, Mei‐Ling Ho, Ming‐Cheng Weng, Ching‐Lin Hsieh, Ming‐Long Yeh, Jau‐Hong Lin and Miao‐Ju Hsu. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.