Cheryl Ingram‐Smith

2.0k total citations
34 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Cheryl Ingram‐Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry and Infectious Diseases. According to data from OpenAlex, Cheryl Ingram‐Smith has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Molecular Biology, 17 papers in Materials Chemistry and 10 papers in Infectious Diseases. Recurrent topics in Cheryl Ingram‐Smith's work include Enzyme Structure and Function (17 papers), Amoebic Infections and Treatments (9 papers) and Biochemical and Molecular Research (7 papers). Cheryl Ingram‐Smith is often cited by papers focused on Enzyme Structure and Function (17 papers), Amoebic Infections and Treatments (9 papers) and Biochemical and Molecular Research (7 papers). Cheryl Ingram‐Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States and France. Cheryl Ingram‐Smith's co-authors include Kerry S. Smith, James G. Ferry, Stephen R. Martin, Miriam S. Hasson, D.A.R. Sanders, Barrett I. Woods, David R. Cooper, Karen J. Miller, Matthew L. Fowler and Robert D. Barber and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, The Plant Cell and Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

In The Last Decade

Cheryl Ingram‐Smith

34 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Cheryl Ingram‐Smith United States 16 562 279 218 158 147 34 1.0k
Nicole R. Buan United States 19 839 1.5× 210 0.8× 194 0.9× 84 0.5× 84 0.6× 39 1.2k
Lars Rohlin United States 15 753 1.3× 458 1.6× 113 0.5× 210 1.3× 335 2.3× 17 1.4k
W.M. de Vos Netherlands 7 479 0.9× 127 0.5× 172 0.8× 75 0.5× 168 1.1× 10 874
Thomas J. Lie United States 18 810 1.4× 338 1.2× 92 0.4× 262 1.7× 277 1.9× 27 1.4k
Nils‐Kåre Birkeland Norway 16 807 1.4× 121 0.4× 124 0.6× 265 1.7× 402 2.7× 45 1.2k
Kyle C. Costa United States 17 517 0.9× 334 1.2× 51 0.2× 223 1.4× 313 2.1× 34 1.0k
Eva Biegel Germany 9 559 1.0× 170 0.6× 61 0.3× 77 0.5× 124 0.8× 10 828
Lingyan Li China 18 421 0.7× 60 0.2× 169 0.8× 244 1.5× 151 1.0× 40 1.4k
David A. C. Beck United States 16 486 0.9× 295 1.1× 33 0.2× 206 1.3× 295 2.0× 25 964
J. Michael Henson United States 19 696 1.2× 92 0.3× 101 0.5× 84 0.5× 200 1.4× 38 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl Ingram‐Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl Ingram‐Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl Ingram‐Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl Ingram‐Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl Ingram‐Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl Ingram‐Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl Ingram‐Smith. The network helps show where Cheryl Ingram‐Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cheryl Ingram‐Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cheryl Ingram‐Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cheryl Ingram‐Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cheryl Ingram‐Smith. Cheryl Ingram‐Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ingram‐Smith, Cheryl, et al.. (2023). Glycogen Metabolism and Its Role in Growth and Encystation in Entamoeba histolytica. Life. 13(7). 1529–1529. 1 indexed citations
2.
Ingram‐Smith, Cheryl, et al.. (2017). Investigation of pyrophosphate versus ATP substrate selection in the Entamoeba histolytica acetate kinase. Scientific Reports. 7(1). 5912–5912. 5 indexed citations
3.
Ingram‐Smith, Cheryl, et al.. (2015). Biochemical and Kinetic Characterization of the Eukaryotic Phosphotransacetylase Class IIa Enzyme from Phytophthora ramorum. Eukaryotic Cell. 14(7). 652–660. 1 indexed citations
5.
Thaker, Tarjani, Mikio Tanabe, Matthew L. Fowler, et al.. (2012). Crystal structures of acetate kinases from the eukaryotic pathogens Entamoeba histolytica and Cryptococcus neoformans. Journal of Structural Biology. 181(2). 185–189. 10 indexed citations
6.
Fowler, Matthew L., Cheryl Ingram‐Smith, & Kerry S. Smith. (2012). Novel Pyrophosphate-Forming Acetate Kinase from the Protist Entamoeba histolytica. Eukaryotic Cell. 11(10). 1249–1256. 14 indexed citations
7.
Fowler, Matthew L., Cheryl Ingram‐Smith, & Kerry S. Smith. (2011). Direct Detection of the Acetate-forming Activity of the Enzyme Acetate Kinase. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2 indexed citations
8.
Fowler, Matthew L., Cheryl Ingram‐Smith, & Kerry S. Smith. (2011). Direct Detection of the Acetate-forming Activity of the Enzyme Acetate Kinase. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 9 indexed citations
9.
Barber, Rachel, Luyao Zhang, Maynard V. Olson, et al.. (2011). Complete Genome Sequence of Methanosaeta concilii, a Specialist in Aceticlastic Methanogenesis. Journal of Bacteriology. 193(14). 3668–3669. 57 indexed citations
10.
Shah, Manish B., Cheryl Ingram‐Smith, Leroy L. Cooper, et al.. (2009). The 2.1 Å crystal structure of an acyl‐CoA synthetase from Methanosarcina acetivorans reveals an alternate acyl‐binding pocket for small branched acyl substrates. Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics. 77(3). 685–698. 16 indexed citations
11.
Smith, Kerry S. & Cheryl Ingram‐Smith. (2007). Methanosaeta, the forgotten methanogen?. Trends in Microbiology. 15(4). 150–155. 354 indexed citations
12.
Ingram‐Smith, Cheryl, Stephen R. Martin, & Kerry S. Smith. (2006). Acetate kinase: not just a bacterial enzyme. Trends in Microbiology. 14(6). 249–253. 84 indexed citations
13.
Ingram‐Smith, Cheryl & Kerry S. Smith. (2006). AMP‐forming acetyl‐CoA synthetases in Archaea show unexpected diversity in substrate utilization. Archaea. 2(2). 95–107. 35 indexed citations
14.
Ingram‐Smith, Cheryl, et al.. (2005). Characterization of the Acetate Binding Pocket in theMethanosarcina thermophilaAcetate Kinase. Journal of Bacteriology. 187(7). 2386–2394. 44 indexed citations
15.
Ingram‐Smith, Cheryl, et al.. (2005). Characterization of the Acetate Binding Pocket in the Methanosarcina thermophila Acetate Kinase. Journal of Bacteriology. 187(14). 5059–5059. 3 indexed citations
16.
Cooper, David R., et al.. (2001). Urkinase: Structure of Acetate Kinase, a Member of the ASKHA Superfamily of Phosphotransferases. Journal of Bacteriology. 183(11). 3536–3536. 3 indexed citations
17.
Ingram‐Smith, Cheryl, Robert D. Barber, & James G. Ferry. (2000). The Role of Histidines in the Acetate Kinase fromMethanosarcina thermophila. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 275(43). 33765–33770. 26 indexed citations
18.
Ingram‐Smith, Cheryl, et al.. (2000). Identification of Essential Arginines in the Acetate Kinase from Methanosarcina thermophila. Biochemistry. 39(13). 3671–3677. 30 indexed citations
19.
Ingram‐Smith, Cheryl & Karen J. Miller. (1998). Effects of Ionic and Osmotic Strength on the Glucosyltransferase of Rhizobium meliloti Responsible for Cyclic β-(1,2)-Glucan Biosynthesis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 64(4). 1290–1297. 14 indexed citations
20.
Sanders, D.A.R., et al.. (1997). Crystallization of acetate kinase from Methanosarcina thermophila and prediction of its fold. Protein Science. 6(12). 2659–2662. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026