Cheryl de Boer

987 total citations
23 papers, 364 citations indexed

About

Cheryl de Boer is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science and Ocean Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Cheryl de Boer has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 364 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 7 papers in Ocean Engineering. Recurrent topics in Cheryl de Boer's work include Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (9 papers), Water resources management and optimization (7 papers) and Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (5 papers). Cheryl de Boer is often cited by papers focused on Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (9 papers), Water resources management and optimization (7 papers) and Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (5 papers). Cheryl de Boer collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United Kingdom. Cheryl de Boer's co-authors include Hans Bressers, Gail Krantzberg, Johannes Flacke, Gül Özerol, Richard J. Hewitt, César Casiano Flores, Joanne Vinke‐de Kruijf, Jaime Díaz Pacheco, Karin Ingold and Manuel Fischer and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Renewable Energy and Climatic Change.

In The Last Decade

Cheryl de Boer

22 papers receiving 342 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Cheryl de Boer Netherlands 12 103 100 72 56 53 23 364
Stefania Munaretto Netherlands 11 130 1.3× 218 2.2× 36 0.5× 81 1.4× 53 1.0× 23 482
Robert C. Brears United States 10 66 0.6× 138 1.4× 36 0.5× 53 0.9× 46 0.9× 28 408
Frank Hüesker Germany 12 61 0.6× 186 1.9× 40 0.6× 69 1.2× 61 1.2× 18 391
Joshua Fisher United States 10 117 1.1× 113 1.1× 43 0.6× 55 1.0× 45 0.8× 21 400
Andrew Simms United Kingdom 13 131 1.3× 159 1.6× 33 0.5× 51 0.9× 65 1.2× 30 523
Christian Kimmich Czechia 12 101 1.0× 225 2.3× 70 1.0× 115 2.1× 57 1.1× 27 586
Anamika Barua India 13 183 1.8× 90 0.9× 65 0.9× 104 1.9× 71 1.3× 35 564
Peter M. Rudberg Sweden 5 74 0.7× 156 1.6× 20 0.3× 47 0.8× 52 1.0× 9 385
Scott D. Hardy United States 7 44 0.4× 124 1.2× 29 0.4× 28 0.5× 40 0.8× 18 276
Kris Lulofs Netherlands 9 51 0.5× 98 1.0× 28 0.4× 42 0.8× 51 1.0× 26 291

Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl de Boer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl de Boer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl de Boer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl de Boer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl de Boer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl de Boer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl de Boer. The network helps show where Cheryl de Boer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cheryl de Boer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cheryl de Boer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cheryl de Boer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cheryl de Boer. Cheryl de Boer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lachapelle, Paul, Patrick Belmont, Marco Grasso, et al.. (2024). Academic capture in the Anthropocene: a framework to assess climate action in higher education. Climatic Change. 177(3). 9 indexed citations
2.
Warbroek, Beau, Joanne Vinke‐de Kruijf, Maarten J. Arentsen, et al.. (2022). From sectoral to integrative action situations: an institutional perspective on the energy transition implementation in the Netherlands. Sustainability Science. 18(1). 97–114. 10 indexed citations
3.
Hewitt, Richard J., Cheryl de Boer, & Johannes Flacke. (2020). Participatory development of digital support tools for local-scale energy transitions: Lessons from two European case studies. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2. 138–149. 15 indexed citations
4.
Boer, Cheryl de, et al.. (2019). Groundwater governance and implementing the conservation policy: the case study of Rafsanjan Plain in Iran. Environment Development and Sustainability. 22(8). 8183–8210. 14 indexed citations
5.
Flores, César Casiano, et al.. (2018). Towards circular economy – a wastewater treatment perspective, the Presa Guadalupe case. Management Research Review. 41(5). 554–571. 49 indexed citations
6.
Hewitt, Richard J., et al.. (2017). A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Representation of Policy Implementation Processes in a Multi-Actor World. The interdisciplinary journal of Discontinuity Nonlinearity and Complexity. 6(3). 219–245. 3 indexed citations
7.
Hewitt, Richard J., et al.. (2017). Modelling actors’ influence on land use change: a dynamic systems approach. 1 indexed citations
8.
Bressers, Hans, et al.. (2016). Elements of success in cooperatives conformed by Maya women in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. University of Twente Research Information. 1(2). 1. 1 indexed citations
9.
Ingold, Karin, Manuel Fischer, Cheryl de Boer, & Peter P. Mollinga. (2016). Water Management Across Borders, Scales and Sectors: Recent developments and future challenges in water policy analysis. Environmental Policy and Governance. 26(4). 223–228. 19 indexed citations
10.
Hewitt, Richard J., et al.. (2015). Losing the roadmap: Renewable energy paralysis in Spain and its implications for the EU low carbon economy. Renewable Energy. 89. 680–694. 54 indexed citations
11.
Boer, Cheryl de, et al.. (2015). Local power and land use: spatial implications for local energy development. Energy Sustainability and Society. 5(1). 13 indexed citations
12.
Özerol, Gül, et al.. (2013). Water Governance, Policy and Knowledge Transfer. University of Twente Research Information. 34 indexed citations
13.
Bressers, Hans & Cheryl de Boer. (2013). Convergence of boundary judgments and innovative regional development concepts. Management Research Review. 36(12). 1195–1209. 1 indexed citations
14.
Bressers, Hans, Cheryl de Boer, Maia Lordkipanidze, et al.. (2013). Water governance assessment tool: with an elaboration for drought resilience. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 13 indexed citations
15.
Boer, Cheryl de & Hans Bressers. (2013). Water resource co-management and sustainable regional development. Management Research Review. 36(12). 1238–1251. 3 indexed citations
16.
Boer, Cheryl de, et al.. (2013). University of Twente water governance assessment tool - Summary. 1 indexed citations
17.
Boer, Cheryl de & Hans Bressers. (2012). Environmental Reviews and Case Studies: New Strategies for Implementing Locally Integrated Stream Restoration Projects. Environmental Practice. 14(1). 26–34. 2 indexed citations
18.
Boer, Cheryl de & Hans Bressers. (2011). Complex and dynamic implementation processes: the renaturalization of the Dutch Regge River. 28 indexed citations
19.
Boer, Cheryl de, et al.. (2011). Coordination of policies and governance: regime requirements in Dutch freshwater management. Policy Quarterly. 7(4). 1 indexed citations
20.
Krantzberg, Gail & Cheryl de Boer. (2008). A valuation of ecological services in the Laurentian Great Lakes Basin with an emphasis on Canada. American Water Works Association. 100(6). 100–111. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026