Cheryl Blackmore-Prince

9 papers receiving 376 citations

Peers

Cheryl Blackmore-Prince
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 167
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 165
  • Epidemiology 163
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 160
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 59
Replace James P. Youngblood with:
James P. Youngblood United States
Wouter J. Meijer Netherlands
Suzanne Coleman United States
Heather Sankey United States
Charlene Collier United States
Joseph C. Scott United States
Maria Castillo United States
Margaret Stager United States
Jim Neilson United Kingdom
Margaret Cotroneo United States
Cheryl Blackmore-Prince relative to James P. Youngblood United States James P. Youngblood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
James P. Youngblood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl Blackmore-Prince

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl Blackmore-Prince's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl Blackmore-Prince with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl Blackmore-Prince more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl Blackmore-Prince

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl Blackmore-Prince. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl Blackmore-Prince. The network helps show where Cheryl Blackmore-Prince may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cheryl Blackmore-Prince

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cheryl Blackmore-Prince. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cheryl Blackmore-Prince based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cheryl Blackmore-Prince. Cheryl Blackmore-Prince is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 48
2
Race, clinical factors and pre-term birth in a low-income urban setting.
3
3
Are interpregnancy intervals between consecutive live births among black women associated with infant birth weight?
3
4 6
5 24
6 22
7 202
8 31
9
Quality Assessment ofFetal Death Records inGeorgia: AMethodfor Improvement
0
10 59

About Cheryl Blackmore-Prince

Cheryl Blackmore-Prince is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Microbiology and General Health Professions, having authored 10 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (2 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (2 papers) and Child and Adolescent Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (167 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (165 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (23 citations). Cheryl Blackmore-Prince has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Uganda and Kenya. Frequent co-authors include Robert H. Lapinski, Gertrud S. Berkowitz, David A. Savitz, Nedra Whitehead, Donna J. Brogan, Holly A. Hill, James A. Gaudino, Charles J. Lockwood, Felice Petraglia and Pasquale Florio. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Epidemiology, American Journal of Public Health and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026